Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 9
  • Fred Ricci

    November 27, 2013 at 9:07 am in reply to: Difficult to fine tune colors in Resolve

    Are you using a panel?
    Tweaking values with numeric pad or mouse gives you this “odd jumps”.
    When working with a panel, you get much more range than whats showing in the gui.

    Resolve Beta 10 OSX 10.8.2
    Macpro 5.1 12×2,66
    GTX 570 MacVidcards
    12 Giga RAM
    16 Giga SAS

  • Fred Ricci

    September 26, 2013 at 8:59 am in reply to: Resolve 10 crash

    Same problem, different specs.

    Resolve Beta 10 OSX 10.8.2
    Macpro 5.1 12×2,66
    GTX 570 MacVidcards
    12 Giga RAM
    16 Giga SAS

  • Fred Ricci

    September 26, 2013 at 8:43 am in reply to: Resolve10 issue

    As long as I stick to progressive media, everything is working fine here…

    Resolve Beta 10 OSX 10.8.2
    Macpro 5.1 12×2,66
    GTX 570 MacVidcards
    12 Giga RAM
    16 Giga SAS

  • Fred Ricci

    September 25, 2013 at 8:31 am in reply to: “Enable video field processing” crashes Davinci

    Hello there.
    I am having the same issue with interlaced rendering.
    Here are the specs: Mac Pro 2 X 2,66 6 core, 12G Ram, GTX 570 MacVidcards for both Cuda and GUI.
    As soon as I click enable video field processing in the settings page, If there’s any motion blur, mattes overlayed with grain in track or any OFX Plugs, the application immediately quits.
    The field rendering in the delivery page does not render fields if you dont also enabled it in the settings page, but this is the same behavior as version 9 for me.
    Any thoughts?
    Thanks

    Resolve 9 OSX 10.8.2
    Macpro 5.1 12×2,66
    GT 120 QUADRO 4000
    8 Giga RAM
    16 Giga SAS

  • Fred Ricci

    June 19, 2013 at 8:35 am in reply to: F55/65 Lut’s

    Hi Juan, would you point me to the luts within the sony site? I found the raw viewer, but that’s all.
    Thanks

    Resolve 9 OSX 10.8.2
    Macpro 5.1 12×2,66
    GT 120 QUADRO 4000
    8 Giga RAM
    16 Giga SAS

  • Fred Ricci

    January 24, 2013 at 9:25 am in reply to: Davinci Resolve GPU

    Hi guys
    So, wich is the best according to you: 4 giga Evga 680 or the base 2 giga model?

    Resolve 9 OSX 10.8.2
    Macpro 5.1 12×2,66
    GT 120 QUADRO 4000
    8 Giga RAM
    16 Giga SAS

  • Fred Ricci

    January 22, 2013 at 5:35 pm in reply to: Resolve 9.1 10 to 8bit monitoring issue.

    Thank you all for the kind suggestions.
    And I know I should put more ram in it, as it only has 8g.
    But tha’s not the issue here as this is not my machine, and please note that the specs are still within BM recommendations. Yesterday it was working pretty well and today its not. I mean, not the 8 bit part anyway.
    Regards

    Resolve 9 OSX 10.8.2
    Macpro 5.1 12×2,66
    GT 120 QUADRO 4000
    8 Giga RAM
    16 Giga SAS

  • Fred Ricci

    December 19, 2012 at 3:13 pm in reply to: Off topic

    Hi Sascha, thanks for sharing your experience.
    I dont have to pipe dpxs since I have most of the time prores or dnxhd to work with.
    But the problem is the producers are space freaks and want me to backup on prores lt or dnxhd 120, wich I disagree because its not worth the time grading if everything is back to an 8bit very compressed codec in my opinion.
    But the difference between 220 and 120 is half the file size and they keep bugging me with it.
    Best regards

    Resolve 9
    Mac pro 4.1 octo 2,26
    GTX 570 GUI and CUDA
    8 Giga RAM
    SOFT RAID 8 Tera

  • Fred Ricci

    November 5, 2012 at 9:40 am in reply to: Media Pool not seeing clips

    Hi
    Do the files have the proper mov extension?

    Resolve 9
    Mac pro 4.1 octo 2,26
    GTX 570 GUI and CUDA
    8 Giga RAM
    SOFT RAID 8 Tera

  • Fred Ricci

    October 18, 2012 at 8:07 am in reply to: DaVinci Resolve 9.0.2 now available

    Burn in sdi rules.

    Resolve 9
    Mac pro 4.1 octo 2,26
    GTX 570 GUI and CUDA
    8 Giga RAM
    SOFT RAID 8 Tera

Page 1 of 9

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy