Forum Replies Created

Page 123 of 172
  • Eric Pautsch

    June 7, 2008 at 12:20 am in reply to: Encore CS3, Blu-ray and script
  • Eric Pautsch

    June 6, 2008 at 11:54 pm in reply to: Blu-Ray Birth Pains

    Other than Scenarist or Blu print, which will cost you a bundle, you might want to to check out Netblender’s tool.

    https://www.netblender.com/

  • Eric Pautsch

    June 6, 2008 at 6:48 pm in reply to: Blu-Ray Birth Pains

    Will the Blu-Ray genesis be any easier?

    Nope. Were right back where we started.

  • Eric Pautsch

    June 2, 2008 at 4:48 am in reply to: Interesting/Frustrating 48 hours

    Try right clicking on the image and choose “burn with image burn”. Did you burn the folders UDF 2.5? I admit it’s strange your burns work for BD-RE and not BD-R if you burning both exactly the same

  • Eric Pautsch

    June 2, 2008 at 3:41 am in reply to: Interesting/Frustrating 48 hours

    .

  • Eric Pautsch

    June 1, 2008 at 5:03 pm in reply to: Interesting/Frustrating 48 hours

    I’ve used Encore once and can rightfully say it’s a piece of junk.

    Just curious…which folders are included from the build? BDMV, AACS and or CERTIFICATE folders?

    Eric

  • Eric Pautsch

    May 31, 2008 at 6:50 pm in reply to: Scenarist Bug Object Design Simulation Window

    Nope…knock on wood 🙂

  • Eric Pautsch

    May 31, 2008 at 6:00 pm in reply to: Scenarist Bug Object Design Simulation Window

    Not sure I can agree with that last statement. If you can find another spec tool, I like to hear what it is. Some titles require a spec tool and Scenarist is all thats available. I do agree that the interface is a little clunky…and undo would be nice as well 🙂 What do you mean by animated button generator? Why would anyone design menus in Scenarist?

    It’s 5K these days. If you need a spec tool you really have no other choice. If you have the amount of work required to afford a system then it surely is worth the money.

  • Sure Blu Ray will support this. Not sure if Encore will 🙂

  • Eric Pautsch

    May 21, 2008 at 3:14 pm in reply to: Progressive playback on non progressive players

    1. Yes but I think you may be confused. If a program is interlaced, keep it interlaced. However, there will be no plyback from a players P outputs. If a program is Progressive, encode as a progressive stream. This way a player with P outputs will show a progressive picture. The same player will output interlaced from the normal outputs…makes sense? Never deinterlace a progressive stream…you loose half your temporal information.

    2. No

Page 123 of 172

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy