[Emo Denemo]

I could say the same about Las Vegas! I only went there once for one night, after driving from LA, and I was amazed. It really is an incredible city. You even have your Eiffel tower! I hope I find the opportunity to visit there again.

Regarding the workflow, if I understand well you essentially export in ProRes from AE, and import in PP, go back and forth as many times as necessary, then render from PP? Am I getting that right?

It may sound silly, but when you write : “For distribution to clients for viewing H.264 is a better choice since it is way smaller, but more compressed.” I’m not sure I understand what it means. Do you mean for distribution on the web?

What is the highest video quality that would be exportable and possibly viewed on a screen? (Maybe newbie question too).

By the way, I really liked your video “Time” on youtube. Loved the intro – not to mention the song! And the visual design and compositing work is very impressive.

[Emo Denemo]

Thank you so much for your answer.
To be entirely honest, I am not a 100% sure I know what is the best codec. ProRes seems heavy to me. Would you have an idea?
Besides, I am going to try it as soon as I can.
So thanks again.
Irrelevant, but funny : I saw that you live in Las Vegas, and I live in Paris. This is really 2013!

[Emo Denemo]

Hello Tom,
this is a quite old thread, but as I read it, I realized that I didn’t know if there was another posssible workflow which didn’t imply dynamic link, like exporting back and forth between premiere and after effects.
Do several renderings alter or lessen the quality of the video.
I’m sorry if this is a total newbie questions, or if it has been answered in another thread, but I just couldn’t find it on CC forum.
Thanks,
Emo