[Emily Millay haddad]

Found the filter, applied it and it seems to have solved my problem for now.

Goodness, that is weird watching it change in FCP and do almost nothing in the “reference monitor” of my GV-HD700.

Thanks for all the help, guys.

[Emily Millay haddad]

😛 You almost gave me a heart attack. I bought this camera about five years ago, and the 16:9 chip was one of the big selling points for me then (along with the Canon glass and interchangeable lenses). But it’s been so long since I’ve did that research that I thought — for a split second — that maybe I had been wrong!

Oy vey. Anyways — thanks for the reality check. 🙂

[Emily Millay haddad]

Hey there Dave,

Thanks for taking the time to respond — I did a few searches in Creative Cow forums for folks handling problems similar to mine before I posted. I believe I started with clips that were set to “None,” or possibly “Not set.” Then when I saw other posts, one of the pieces of advice was to set the field dominance to “lower” for everything, so I tried that too. I’ll try again and see what comes up, though I’m going to give some of the other pieces of advice a shot, too.

Thanks again!

Emily

[Emily Millay haddad]

Hey Ben,

Thanks for responding! My sequence is definitely set for 16:9, as were my capture settings. I’ll check the RT settings as well, but I think that Alan’s answer below about the YUV 4:1:1 DV capacities is probably more at play, since the entire show was low red light only.

The only exterior playback monitor that I have is my GV-HD700 clamshell. Interestingly enough, when I use the clamshell as an external AV device, and send this wacky jagged picture to it, it looks fine. As in smooth and perfect. As in… what?? So… hmmm… Can I edit this blocky thing and swallow my distaste, then output it in FCP in some way that the jaggedness isn’t also exported? If this is somehow just some weird artifact that’s occurring in FCP that will cease to occur once I properly output, I’m happy to do that.

Any thoughts?

[Emily Millay haddad]

Hey there Alan,

Thanks for this — I knew that shooting in such low light, and effectively with a chroma key light only, was likely to present a problem. I just wasn’t expecting this! I have some a beginner’s understanding of how this works, but I appreciate you taking the time to explain it.

Here’s a question — if I desaturated the footage and basically removed all chroma information, focusing entirely on the more densely packed luma information, would that solve the jagged edges and go to a smoother image? I’m going to try it, but I’m curious about what you think theoretically.

I’m also curious about why the footage looks fine in my camera’s viewfinder (in playback) and on the clamshell’s screen. The footage was captured onto a MiniDV tape and encoded at that point onto the tape into a DV codec (right?), so why does it change and become so crappy looking just because I move the data from the physical media onto my computer? I can see through my camera and the clamshell that the data has the capacity to look fine — so why can’t I work with /that/ image in my editor? If you or other folks have time to shed some light on the subject, I’d be grateful.

Thanks again for the help.