Matte,
I have to (continue to) disagree.
Yes, an NTSC CRT monitor IS the best way to actually see the image. But these days, an LCD is a perfectly acceptable alternative, IF you’re aware of its limitations.
1. Never make an exposure decision on the image alone. Use the camera’s zebra bars. (I’d apply this to CRTs as well as LCDs).
2. Critical focus can be done with an external monitor, but checking with the camera viewfinder is a good idea. The VF itself may (or may not) have more pixels than the external monitor, and also the camera may add additional sharpening to the VF image that is not available on an external signal.
3. For high definition work, an SD monitor (or viewfinder) may not do the job. An HD LCD with a native resolution that’s the same as the camera’s output could be a better choice, especially if you can’t afford a $6,000 HD CRT monitor.
4. The change in brightness and colorimetry with viewing angle is a problem unique to LCDs. You do need to look at them straight on.
5. My point about the DVRack having test equipment built-in is that you can use it to:
a) calibrate your laptop display using SMPTE color bars. This will get the image very close to that of an NTSC CRT monitor.
b) More importantly, you can shoot a physical color bar chart with your camera, to check white balance. You can shoot a gray chart to check exposure. The WFM and vectorscope will tell you a lot more about the setup than you can see with your naked eye on any sort of monitor, either LCD or CRT.
Regards,
Doug Graham