Forum Replies Created

  • Dooger D

    May 22, 2005 at 6:37 pm in reply to: Timecode FUBAR

    Hi Kieran, I think you nailed it. On this project I did just roll in the loads and and come back 30 minutes later. There were always more frames than expected at the end but I just figured the system would TC address the blank signal as black. Thinking back, I have never had any problem when I log and batch component and I never have any problems with digital because it does auto stop when the signal stops. It’s just a bummer now because I am faced with redigitizing about 22 hours of media and I will have to rebuild the entire show for a proper EDL. THANK YOU for your wisdom. I will never make that mistake again.

  • Dooger D

    May 22, 2005 at 1:32 am in reply to: Timecode FUBAR

    Thanks Jim for your response. Unfortunately my problem is not that simple. The TC is off on the original digitized clip and there is no consistant offset. I can look at the TC in & out on the digitized clip and manually go to that point on the original tape and it is way off. In one instance I digitized a 30 min. BSP tape with a TC break that went from Hr.06 to Hr.00 in the same tape and it didn’t even catch that. It just continued to Digitize at Hr.06. It’s not a “record run” / “free run” issue either. ????? I’m wondering if and hoping that it won’t be a P6000 hardware issue. Thanks Anyway.

  • Dooger D

    May 22, 2005 at 1:19 am in reply to: Timecode FUBAR

    Thanks Larry – I tried many DF / NDF tests and it doesn’t seem to be the problem. I even tried redigitizing directly into a bin of selects and the TC registered to the original clips are some how way off. Thank you for the suggestion though.

  • Dooger D

    May 22, 2005 at 1:14 am in reply to: Timecode FUBAR

    Thanks Bouke, I’ll take the 1800 in for a doctor’s visit and see if they can clean the TC Head. Do you think there could be a problem with the P6000 card itself?

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy