Forum Replies Created

  • Deparon

    May 27, 2007 at 1:14 am in reply to: Three Month HD Timelapse

    Sorry…4,320 minutes and 72 hours…I know i am drinkin’ TO MUCH at this moment…but

    regards

  • Deparon

    May 27, 2007 at 1:10 am in reply to: Three Month HD Timelapse

    The use of stills cameras is the better idea you can find. Take that recomendation…By other side I thing in a 3 months timelapse a frame per second looks too much….I don’t know what will you film…but if it is a construction or some like that yo must calculate what you want….by example in three months you will get near 8 millions of seconds (and frames or pics)….near 8 millions of frames or pics at 30 fps means around 260,000 seconds of movie or 4,320 hours…I know i am drinkin’ at this moment…but

    regards

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy