Dennis Radeke
Forum Replies Created
-
assuming that you removed preferences when you uninstalled, did you clear your media cache in preferences>media?
-
Yeah, can’t say…
-
[Bill Davis] “As someone who took me to task (quite correctly) for the potentially dismissive nature of leaving an “e” off Premiere, I’m a bit surprised at the “this is no big deal” response.”
I said this was a pet peeve of mine (my own, me alone, IMO, not Adobe etc.) as it is pervasive. Does the spelling of Premiere make any difference of the product, its perception or its success? Absolutely not. Neither does the name of the forum affect the success of a product as you so eloquently attest daily here at the Cow.
[Bill Davis] ”
First, the title of the forum is not “FCPX debate or not”. It’s FCP X or Not, The Debate. Those two strings of words emphasize VERY different things.”To repeat myself…
Cut’n’paste
1 – The forum title, “FCPX or Not: the Debate” never makes the statement that FCPX is a toy. It is individuals and particular threads that do that. Furthermore and perhaps most importantly, whatever you change the title of the forum to, that point will still be made by some. As someone who has worked with the “toy” NLE Premiere Pro for 10+ years, I can say this, “get over it.” You choose your tool, you go to your happy place, you edit and all is good – who cares what other people say?
2 – As a supporting point, do you notice that Adobe employees never chafe at the Creative Cloud Debate forum? They’re employees yet respect the community and their points of view. I would argue that we’re all (mostly) grownups and can deal with contrarian points of view. That’s what makes the Cow community and this forum in particular, great.Nothing will change by changing the title of the forum, development of your favorite tools and their perception in the industry will. Again, see Premiere Pro’s very long history and bumpy, turning road as an example.
All of THAT said, if people really want to change it, heck – why not?
end cut’n’paste
I almost have to ask if you read my first response? Maybe start with what is now bold
[Bill Davis] “I wonder how sensitive to the topic you might be if you had been showing up on a forum for 4 years where the discussion centers around the PRESUMPTION that there must be very valid reasons NOT to use Premiere?”
I guess I already have an answer to my question above since I preemptively addressed it in point #1. Premiere Pro was dismissed as a toy for far more than 4 years.
-
While I recuse “Dennis – Adobe Guy” on the grounds that I’m with a vendor, I’ll speak as a member of the community and make just a couple of quick points.
1 – The forum title, “FCPX debate or not” never makes the statement that FCPX is a toy. It is individuals and particular threads that do that. Furthermore and perhaps most importantly, whatever you change the title of the forum to, that point will still be made by some. As someone who has worked with the “toy” NLE Premiere Pro for 10+ years, I can say this, “get over it.” You choose your tool, you go to your happy place, you edit and all is good – who cares what other people say?
2 – As a supporting point, do you notice that Adobe employees never chafe at the Creative Cloud Debate forum? They’re employees yet respect the community and their points of view. I would argue that we’re all (mostly) grownups and can deal with contrarian points of view. That’s what makes the Cow community and this forum in particular, great.Nothing will change by changing the title of the forum, development of your favorite tools and their perception in the industry will. Again, see Premiere Pro’s very long history and bumpy, turning road as an example.
All of THAT said, if people really want to change it, heck – why not?
Dennis – “Cow community guy”
-
yeah, you’re going to have to figure that one out for yourself. If I made a list of reasons why it makes sense, I’d start a whole ‘nuther conversation which would be the umpteenth repeat of similar threads, right?
Good luck and thanks,
Dennis – Adobe guy -
[Morten Hilmer] ”
The only reason why I use the GPU mode is that the render time for the timeline is much shorter.
Though the time for exporting this 2 minutes and 39 seconds video with only one video track and one audio track into a 4k mp4 takes 15 minutes and 31 seconds no matter if I use GPU or Software in the media encoder.Shouldn’t it be faster when enabling the GPU?”
Not necessarily. As you will hear me say, it is all about balance. If we put a full load on the GPU, and not on the CPU, we’re just moving the problem. Ideally, we are trying to balance and get full use out of both CPU and GPU wherever possible.
Rendering or creating output is more the purview of the CPU. The GPU is used in part but really the bulk of AME usage is going to be the CPU.
How is the GPU used then? If there are GPU accelerated effects in the timeline before you render, the GPU can be used to accelerate aspects of that process.
More recently, we have added the feature of allowing the GPU to assist in the decode of the video for large frame camera formats like RED, ARRI & C-DNG.
HTH,
Dennis -
😉 Quite possibly!
-
Do you have the source and program monitors set to ‘full’ on the bottom of each panel/window? If so, I would pull them back to 1/2 or 1/4. Likely your monitor isn’t a 4k display, so turning that down to 1/4 is the most logical answer.
Also note, that 4k H.264 is quite difficult to playback even on current machines.
HTH
Dennis – Adobe guy -
From the sound of it, I would try one of two things
1 – roll back your nvidia drivers to something earlier
2 – If you can definitively know that the problem lies with the GPU acceleration, turn it off temporarily to get the edit done.I believe #1 will fix your problem.
Dennis – Adobe guy
-
I am sure you are right in that all companies will offer different volume opportunities based on the BBC needs. Apple has a slew of terrific hardware in addition to software, lest we forget!
[Bill Davis] “Premier.”
sigh…this is my pet peeve. It is Premiere Pro or at least Premiere. Can you help me out here? Thanks.