Forum Replies Created

  • David Sallak

    April 6, 2005 at 4:19 am in reply to: P2 – Mastering question

    Trying to bring clarity to the conversation, Jeremy…

    > Also, a big (and quite possibly misunderstood) caveat of the 1200A, is that
    > there is no deck control through the RS-422…

    Whoops, I am happy to tell you the 1200a comes with 422 interface as standard.
    Good ol’ serial deck control on every version of this deck.

    > We might need decks to edit with P2, but we are sure going to need something
    > to master to.

    You could master to HDV because it exists on tape and is affordable, but you can only record to it via firewire 4:2:0 colorspace. You are re-compressing your edit to become a MPEG2 Long-GOP master. Not a method I would chose, but many will accept it.

    > I work on a lot of live shows where tape is still very much in
    > existence, be it HD or SD. I am preparing for a show in June with a 12 x 25
    > foot screen all running HD. It’s not like I am going to hand over a wad of P2
    > cards and tell the tape ops (or media ops in this case) to have at it.

    Some of the more progressive facilities I work with are eliminating tape at the door, and choosing to manage their media in a purely digital format. A bit “out-there” for many, but it points the way to where the industry is trending. P2 is a part of this trend, and many will appreciate the flexibility of tapeless formats.

    As H.264 (WMV HD) becomes known as a great HD presentation format, and more DVD players adopt it, I expect this will gain acceptance as the affordable presentation tool for approval and entertainment. After all, DVD player units with H.264 will be a helluva lot cheaper than the blu-ray players for at least a year, and you can export HD into this format from most edit systems for a much cheaper price than using your HDV camera or deck to show your project to friends.

    David

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy