David Klein
Forum Replies Created
-
[Walter Soyka] “Once the pulldown removal is active, the clip is treated as if it were 23.976 progressive material.”
I understand this, it’s seems to be a fairly logical concept.
[Walter Soyka] ”
Better to shoot true 24p next time, or with advanced pulldown, or at 29.97, whichever your camera allows.”So…either use true 24p, enable the advanced pulldown method (if available), or just shoot at 30fps (29.97)?
-
Well, I fooled around with the pulldown options a bit, and it seems that WSSWWW works just fine. My only question is this (And maybe this is just a result of the pulldown): The video plays fine in a 23.976 comp (The interpreter says it has an effective fps of 23.976), but some frames seem to have some very slight interlacing artifacts if I look closely around the edges of motion. Without any pulldown and just using Upper field first, (although the framerate is not right), all the frames seem pretty clean. However, with the pulldown removal, some frames have a slight ‘residue’ of interlacing. Is this an unavoidable fact of pulldown, or is there something else I can do? The best quality option is greyed out as well…
-
I have several gigabytes of footage and a slow internet connection, so any web-based conversion service is kind of out of the question. Thanks anyway, though…I’ve bookmarked the website for potential future use.
-
I already have rendered out all the frames to raw png’s in 1280 x 545, but I think I see what you mean. I should create a 1280 x 720 comp with black bg and drop my existing film (At 1280 x 545) in there, right? Also, doesn’t the 16:9 DVD preset give a bit higher resolution than 4:3 dvd?
One other thing, should I downscale my comp to the dvd preset size before I render?