Forum Replies Created

Page 12 of 40
  • Dave Gage

    October 24, 2013 at 2:24 am in reply to: Question for Craig Seeman

    [Craig Seeman]
    You can certainly use Blackmagic Media Express which comes free with the MiniRecorder”

    Cool. That sounds like a good plan. It seems like a pretty good deal for $137.

    [Craig Seeman] “BTW this is the “tape” workaround for FCPX as well. Feed the Tape deck intp BMD MiniRecorder and record in MediaExpress to ProRes and you’d then have your tape input/recording to ProRes for editing in FCPX.”

    That sounds good too. I guessing you mean input via the SDI connection. I can’t think of anything I own that has that connector type, but I suppose there’d be an adapter for it. What “tape” source(s) are you using it for? I have an old Canon GL1 (sitting in mothballs), but even that is FW.

    Thanks,
    Dave

  • [Craig Seeman] “I’m not quite sure what you mean by that.”

    Craig,

    I’ve been using x264 for years and the .mp4 encodes work great on my website and for Youtube uploads. For the time being, H.265 may be overkill for my needs. I haven’t done a lick of testing yet, but may want/need to in the near future.

    [Craig Seeman] “If you find H.264 slow to encode now, imagine something at least twice as slow.”
    I’ve never actually thought of it as slow, it just is what it is. But twice as long might be annoyingly slow.

    Craig, did you ever see my question for you in the Wirecast forum?
    https://forums.creativecow.net/thread/260/620
    I haven’t picked up one of the BM Mini Recorders yet, but I have since found it comes with software which may be what you were referring to in the original review you posted.

    Thanks,
    Dave

  • [Julian Bowman]
    Just re-read and saw you put h.265 files. Ok, a quick read suggests it is like h.264 but keeps file sizes smaller.”

    Does anyone know if this is true? Is H.265 like the “new” x264 codec?

    Thanks,
    Dave

  • Dave Gage

    October 20, 2013 at 3:06 am in reply to: Tag, you’re it.

    [Charlie Austin] “Hey, did you get my earlier reply about changing tags in bulk?”

    I saw it right after you posted and then it disappeared. NSA.

  • Dave Gage

    October 16, 2013 at 8:17 pm in reply to: As usual…

    [Andrew Richards] “This thread?”

    Andy,

    Yep, dat be da one. Thanks for the reminder, I went through and read the whole thread again. And you were the one that essentially answered my question. I’m in no hurry, but maybe someone will come out with something at some point.

    Actually, if OWC or someone else made a reasonably priced bare drive dock with a Thunderbolt connection, I’d be a happy fella. I realize TB is overkill for a single drive, but it would give me the eSata or USB 3 speed without using either of those. As I said in that linked post, I now edit off a 2nd internal drive in the MBP, so it’s really about speeding up backups for me.

    Dave

  • Dave Gage

    October 15, 2013 at 9:07 pm in reply to: As usual…

    [Gary Huff] “but USB3 bites me in the ass every time a producer tosses a bus-powered drive at me to store the REDCODE or ProResHQ footage that I’m shooting.”

    I specifically called and talked to OWC awhile back about whether they might have plans to create an inexpensive TB to USB 3 cable or dock, but nothing was planned and the market for it wouldn’t be great since this issue only affects roughly 2011 MBP and iMacs users. I don’t have clients, so that’s not an issue for me, but I’d like to move from eSata and FW800 bare drive docks to USB3 for speed and ease of use.

    Someone here mentioned awhile back that a ThunderBolt to USB 3 cable wouldn’t be easy to make for technical reasons (don’t remember what they were), but that would be perfect for me.

    Dave

  • Dave Gage

    October 15, 2013 at 5:55 pm in reply to: As usual…

    [Gary Huff] ” I may have to go out and get the 2012 15″ non-Retina model.”

    I’m not exactly flush at the moment, but considering picking up another 2011-12 i7 Quad 17″ MBP when I have some dough. I think we both did the same MBP upgrades and I’m really happy with mine so I’d pick another one from the online Apple Store/ Refurbished section. The new one would go to my wife and then if I needed an emergency backup MBP, I can use hers. I’m still a fan of the 17″ size (old eyes) and the 1920×1200 screen resolution as I don’t need to go to 4k anytime soon. I wish these models had USB 3 built-in, but I can live with Thunderbolt and FW800.

    Dave

  • Dave Gage

    October 11, 2013 at 5:05 pm in reply to: Weirdness on Export

    [Sam Comer] “I don’t use Compressor because we don’t have it in the studio.”

    I’ve begun using the free MPEG StreamClip over Compressor for some things these days because the H.264 or x264 output is also viewable on Android devices H.264 from Compressor and FCP X are not at least without some tweaking that I haven’t been able to find). I have no idea if your issue is the app method of export, but you could download MPEG StreamClip and give it a try. And yes, if you have the x264 codec loaded, it will see it and will become an option when you choose “Export as MPEG4…”

    Dave

  • Dave Gage

    October 11, 2013 at 11:23 am in reply to: Canon XA20 MP4 and AVCHD into FCPX

    [Claude Lyneis] “Is there an advantage for AVCHD at 24 Mbs 59.94i over MP4 29.97 P for quality, editing or anything else? I would like to choose one and stay with it so I am not mixing formats.”

    Yes, I would like to know this too. I thinking of picking up an inexpensive “Canon VIXIA HF R400 Full HD Camcorder” to use as a second angle for multicam. The CMOS is only 1/4.85″, but hopefully it would be good enough for a second angle (maybe not).
    https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/909788-REG/Canon_8155b004_VIXIA_HF_R400_Full.html

    My older Canon HF S100 Vixia is no great shakes either, but is fine for what I’m shooting. The S100 shoots AVCHD at 1080p 30fps. This R400 shoots at these choices:

    AVCHD Progressive
    1920 x 1080p / 60 fps (28Mbps)
    1920 x 1080i / 60 fps (24Mbps)
    1920 x 1080p / 30 fps (17Mbps)

    MPEG4
    1920 x 1080p / 60 fps (35Mbps)
    1920 x 1080p / 30 fps (24Mbps)
    1920 x 1080p / 24 fps (17Mbps)

    I edit with AVCHD and MP4 footage all the time on my 2011 Quad i7 17″ in FCP X without any issues. If I decide on this camera, would it be best to stick with the AVCHD as James seems to think for better quality? I have a feeling if the “look” is about the same as my Canon S100, either format would work. Also, I always first use ClipWrap on the AVCHD and work with the native footage.

    Thanks,
    Dave

  • [Mitch Ives] “It’s an American product, an American company, and when you have a significant problem you should be able to address it directly with them. Having to call India where their hands are tied… they’re reading prompts off the screen and cannot help you is the problem.”

    I agree 100%. I use Adobe Connect and the support in India is horrendous. When I move off of Connect to GoToMeeting or something else, it will be the last time I use anything made by Adobe. They have wasted massive amounts of my time.

    Dave

Page 12 of 40

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy