Forum Replies Created

  • Can you get contrast and pivot on the MC Colour? I haven’t been able to find it…

  • Hi, thanks for the info. Its a Mac Pro 12 Core, 24gb ram, with a cubix expander which has one quadro 4000. I think the display gfx card is an ati 5870.

  • No, it’s all prores 1920×1080 hq 25fps.

    I’ve now been working with it switched off and I can render interlaced prores files having selected “fcp-roundtrip” which has un-greyed the “field rendering” tick box. The results look fine with smooth interlaced motion.

    All seems ok. I don’t quite get the “enable field processing” option anyway. Is it to allow key-framed events such as zoom ins to be smoother? i.e. update the zoom every field rather than frame?

  • Thanks, I managed to get it to work as I want. I don’t really get it because I thought the key channel would need to go somewhere but happy to get the result!

  • I’d like to know this also. 8 out of 10 times the ref wipe doesn’t get me where I want because of framing.

  • Thanks Rohit. But the layer mixer has only rgb inputs doesn’t it? Where does the key signal go?

    I sometimes use the parallel mixer, but it is hard to tell how it combines the signals.

  • Thanks everyone. I will try these suggestions out so that I know how to get out of future pickles. This time I have used my workaround of playing it out at 25fps via SDI.

  • Thanks for the input everybody – turns out that the reason they didn’t like my file was because the receiving guy was expecting to actually see 50i type motion. When I explained it was shot progressively but delivered as an interlaced file he started liking my file!

    It seems more straight forward in the tape world – over here everything is delivered “i” regardless of how it was shot.

  • Thanks. I’m not sure why they don’t like my “conversion”. Perhaps they are looking for interlaced 50 field motion, which of course they will not see. I will let them know that the “look” is supposed to be 25 frame progressive. Since the TV broadcast chain is all interlaced – that is why it is a delivery requirement despite 25p acquisition. Also, it’s worth noting that graphics and rolling credits look smoother interlaced.

  • Dave Austin

    February 1, 2013 at 6:35 am in reply to: Avid workflow errors

    I am getting a similar error with rendered media back in Avid. I get “core consistency check error” which is making the whole workflow unusable – I wonder whether I need to do an old school workflow eg stripping all effects off and flattening to a base layer. Did you “resolve” your problem?

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy