Forum Replies Created

Page 5 of 47
  • Darren Roark

    September 29, 2016 at 7:10 am in reply to: Logic Pro X and MXF

    Have you tried running it through X2Pro?

  • Darren Roark

    September 24, 2016 at 6:53 pm in reply to: NVIDIA and Macs again someday?

    [Erik Lindahl] “I also think the word on the street nVidia wasn’t interested in a custom GPU for the MacPro-class machine.”

    The cards were designed by Apple, the chips made by AMD are the same as they are in the PC cards AFAIK.

  • Darren Roark

    September 16, 2016 at 7:01 pm in reply to: 1,000 days since the last Mac Pro update

    [Michael Hancock] “But this is also because Apple decided to redesign the MacPro so you couldn’t swap out the graphics cards when new ones came on the market that were considerably better (like the handful of cards nVidia has released). So their inability to update with any significant leap forward is entirely of their own design.”

    So far eGPU support on Sierra seems very promising. I chalk this gap up to a lot of moving parts weren’t there yet like thunderbolt 3.

    AMD’s OpenCL implementation is much stronger and since their software uses that over nvidia’s proprietary CUDA it makes sense that they would shy away from that the same way they did with flash.

    CUDA was reverse engineered recently showing that it actually runs well on an AMD GPU. This proves to me what I’ve suspected for a while which is “CUDA is just mumbo jumbo tech to keep people locked into nvidia cards”.

    However if they don’t release a GPU update kit for the 2013 mac pros with the new AMD chips I will be very disappointed.

  • Darren Roark

    September 16, 2016 at 4:27 am in reply to: 1,000 days since the last Mac Pro update

    [Joe Marler] “People on Premiere can always go to Windows. For FCPX they are stuck with Apple, so in that sense an updated nMP is vitally important. “

    Agreed, but a Mac Pro refresh of any significance has only really been possible since April as that’s when all the new GPUs came out that were a large enough leap forward.

    All the chipmakers are slowing down cycles by a big margin.

  • Darren Roark

    September 13, 2016 at 3:39 am in reply to: “Missing Camera”

    They may not have imported all the way from the camera cards. Try importing the footage again and see if that fixes it.

  • Darren Roark

    September 11, 2016 at 7:50 am in reply to: Do you think the next FCPX update will require Sierra?

    It’s… Possible?

  • Darren Roark

    September 1, 2016 at 3:40 am in reply to: Waiting for Apple again. And again. And again …

    [Herb Sevush] “”He who speaks, does not know.
    He who knows, does not speak.””

    Nobody speaking is what gives me some shred of hope.

  • Darren Roark

    August 25, 2016 at 3:26 am in reply to: The end of an Episode

    This points to the trend as to why localized computing power will become less important sooner than later and portability will be of more importance than sheer rendering capability.

  • Darren Roark

    August 16, 2016 at 5:07 pm in reply to: relinking 1080p proxies to 4k footage

    [Jeremy Garchow] “If fcpx isn’t importing the footage are you sure this is XAVC footage instead of 4K Sony raw?”

    That was what I was thinking after I hit post. It’s probably the case.

  • Darren Roark

    August 16, 2016 at 6:26 am in reply to: relinking 1080p proxies to 4k footage

    [Jeremy Garchow] “Drag and drop”

    If you want it rewrapped, it’s the import window.

Page 5 of 47

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy