Things to note about tapeless. If I could keep the P2 cards as archives through an entire shoot of 6 weeks, then I’d be on board. But that’s way too expensive. Point 2: either I hire a data wrangler for 6 weeks at huge expense on a remote location, or I risk making transfer mistakes when exhausted from a long day of shooting. Point 3: hard drives are in no way archival devices. They are fragile. They also will fail sitting on a shelf or in use. That’s why we have a pricey Quantum Superloader3 LTO robot to archive to the government/financial industry standard archival medium. All our media is on RAID 50 Rorke HDX Galaxy systems and backed up to LTO3. We’re pretty thorough about this stuff.
All to say, we’ve been in the digital domain since 1993 and have been on the bleeding edge of many technologies, helping to push the industry to more efficient and cost-effective tools. The tapeless workflow fits for productions with a data wrangler, or with limited nightly transfers, but is a bad fit for the many situations described in posts above. When the flash storage price drops to make it a commodity, then those of us in a huge portion of the industy will go tapeless. Red’s CF approach, by the way, is appealing for the relatively generic media it can use from several vendors – competitive storage pricing pressures!