Cory Dzbinski
Forum Replies Created
-
Yeah, he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He may know Vegas but not camcorders. He didn’t even respond to my post/question. Today’s HD camcorders do record in true 1920×1080 which views fine on a computer monitor capable of that resolution…however, he was right about broadcast and Blu-Ray/HD-DVD being 1440×1080. The pixel aspect is simply 1.33:1 (rectangle) instead of 1:1 (square). This creates the same image area as 1920×1080 1:1 pixels. Unfortunately when you burn to Blu-Ray you need to burn at 1440×1080 1.33:1 which your program will convert for you. Good software actually does a calculation on the pixels so you don’t nessesarily “lose” those 480 horizontal pixels.
-
Hey there…I was reading over your replies regarding the 1440 x 1080. I have a Canon HF100.
Video can be recorded in four quality settings: FXP (1920 x 1080, 17 Mbit/s), XP+ (1440 x 1080, 12 Mbit/s), SP (1440 x 1080, 7 Mbit/s), and LP (1440 x 1080, 5 Mbit/s). A SDHC card with the capacity of 16GB and can hold up to 2 hours of video recorded at highest quality setting.
I don’t understand how you say it only records in 1440 x 1080 when the specs state otherwise. Can you elaborate? I think I understand your argument about display and delivery but the camcorder should record in 1920 x 1080…no? You’ll have to explain this in layman’s resolution 101.
After I understand what you’re explaining…in the end should I be rendering my timeline in Vegas at 1440 x 1080 or 1920 x 1080? I’ll be burning the final to Blu-Ray.
-
I don’t agree with the “A singer cannot lip sync 1:1…”. Any professional artist should be able to lip sync and stay with their music within .001 or even .0001 on the 2nd or 3rd take if not the 1st. I’ve seen it done multiple times with amateur artists. If you’re off by that small of an amount it is negligible to 99.99% of the population.