Chris Wright
1
Audio Coin
1
COW Coin
Forum Replies Created
-
The most common reason is interpreted as premultiplied instead of straight or try channel-remove color matting.
-
also there’s two Tiff’s. The quicktime Tiff only does 8 bit, use the 16 bit trillions Tiff sequence lzw compression off.
-
I know exactly what you mean. The only way that 32bpc color correction will work in Premiere is if you use and only use color finesse inside, then use dynamic link or copy paste sequence while both AE and Premiere are open.
One other option is rendering out full 4:4:4 16bit codecs such as Tiff(lzw off), avi 10 bit uncompressed, or some other huge hard drive hogging codec.
Other people may say, oh rendering out 4:2:2 or 4:2:0 is good enough, but after 5 renders, let’s compare chroma loss. AE seems to do a better job with rasterized Fonts, color, and more effects are 16bpc or higher.
-
Instant Hd comes in a Mac flavor too and AE spits out a 9 bitrate. or author in Adobe Encore if compressor doesn’t do 9.
https://www.redgiantsoftware.com/downloads/trial-versions/ -
AE does an ok job of downconverting but you really need specialized hardware or software to do it. Try a demo of instant HD to SD then export out at a crazy 9mbps cbr DVD-R. You will keep 99% quality guaranteed.
-
here’s something close and its free. It runs in a free virtualdub program.
https://compression.ru/video/cartoonizer/index_en.html
-
cc simple wire removal works fantastic but if scratches jump around, you’re looking at some nifty stopwatch transform of the effect. I have never tried motion tracking scratches, but if AE could do it, you could possibly work a little faster.
-
Dave is right, 30p = 60 de-interlaced would be faster, easier, and most professionals that shoot interviews use 30p for Barbara Walter etc. to cut the harshness down. But if you have spare time, hehe, test and compare, it’s only 30 seconds.
-
Some aiff can be un-editably compressed. Variants of AIFF known as AIFF-C or AIFC.
-
the “start” and “output” comp are just names I give 2 new compositions you create so you can follow the directions.
I have tried Andrew’s and my personal opinion is that mine is much smoother/cleaner and his does not interpolate enough. Simply render out 10 seconds of heavy motion and compare them yourself. You won’t hurt my feelings if you choose his 🙂
I recommend this post read which is true for timewarp as twixtor.
https://forums.creativecow.net/thread/69/855438#855438You render out a 23.976 progressive because then for NTSC signal, you transform width and height to NTSC size/par and render lowerfield with pulldown wwssw cadence to get a 29.97 interlaced legal video. That’s how films are sent over the air and still look like film.
Ask them if they do the pulldown themselves or if they would like you to do it. They might use a realtime converter box.