Forum Replies Created

  • Thanks, Daniel. That’s a good bit of info.

    So as a follow up… is it possible that the files which we previously encoded @ 8Mpbs, were of a higher quality and that is why they encoded at the requested bitrate of 8Mbps? In essence, I am just trying to understand why one file encoded at 5.2 and the other at 8.0. Both were from Digibeta, but the lower quality one had at one point originally been BetaSP while the higher quality one has always been at least Digi-beta quality.

    Thoughts?

  • Christopher Campbell

    April 30, 2009 at 5:35 pm in reply to: Up-converting 1080i to 4K in FCP

    Right on. Good info, everyone.

    My fear was that some form of rotten blocking or terrible pixelation would occur in the software conversion process. But what you guys said makes perfect sense. Sounds like they need to examine their hardware and see what can be done to blow up the file on their end as opposed to using a software encoder superfluously.

    Thanks for the info, guys. Much appreciated.

  • Christopher Campbell

    April 30, 2009 at 4:45 pm in reply to: Up-converting 1080i to 4K in FCP

    Thanks for the info. Yes, After Effects I have.

    I’m running the Abode Production suite CS3. I suppose this now makes this an After Effects posting , but what suggestions do you have for taking a Quicktime 1080i and up-converting through AE?

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy