Chris Kenny
Forum Replies Created
-
Chris Kenny
June 26, 2011 at 4:23 am in reply to: Apple big picture….how big of a deal is this really?[Bryan Keith] “It’s certainly a big deal to me, and all the users here, because it directly affects our future business plans. But for Apple, professional Final Cut users are just a miniscule blip on the radar. It’s hard for me to get an objective view because I’m too close to it. “
Having witnessed a lot of Apple-related Internet freak-outs over the last decade, odds are a year from now this won’t even be seen as having been a big deal for Final Cut Pro itself. Realistically, a lot of editors and particularly facilities wait six months or a year before deploying new versions of software anyway. If Apple fills the important feature gaps before that, not many people are actually going to say “Well, sure FCP X looks like a good solution now, but I’m going with something else because I vaguely remember that the handled the rollout badly last year”.
A few will actually be pissed off enough leave the platform. More will join the platform over the coming yeas, as a consequence of Apple now having the most modern rendering engine and user interface of any of the major players.
—
Digital Workflow/Colorist, Nice Dissolve.You should follow me on Twitter here. Or read our blog.
-
[Miles Heckendorn] “I have projects that I have to work on that are two,….three…..four years after the initial project. What are they thinking?!?!”
That you’d prefer to work with those projects as you left them in FCP 7, instead of having them imported with a bunch of screwy changes into FCP X. Which would be inevitable almost regardless of how much effort Apple put into opening old projects, given the differences in the way the timeline works and all the rendering differences that would exist because of the new rendering engine.
—
Digital Workflow/Colorist, Nice Dissolve.You should follow me on Twitter here. Or read our blog.
-
[Michael Aranyshev] “Strictly speaking it doesn’t. However it sits there constantly reminding you of the fact the guy who designed this timeline got his idea of editing from his roommate who’s grandma was cutting Mack Sennet’s flicks with a pair of scissors.”
So your entire objection is to the visual presentation?
—
Digital Workflow/Colorist, Nice Dissolve.You should follow me on Twitter here. Or read our blog.
-
Chris Kenny
June 25, 2011 at 10:14 pm in reply to: Future update to add XML, Multicam and importing of old projects?[Michael Largé] “I will not profess to speak for David but from what I’m gathering, his argument is that you’re citing sources you’re unable to verify, which all journalists know is worthless. You’re stating things as fact (Apple will definitely add missing features) because some “journalists” online have said that they talked to someone at Apple who told them so; even though Apple themselves have made no official statement of any kind, which they’ve had every chance to do, since FCPX’s release. “
I am stating Apple has an intent to add these features because several people who are very unlikely to be lying, and who, based on their past statements and their reputations there is reason to believe Apple talks to, say that Apple has told them this.
This might not meet whatever specific version of a “fact” David is using, but it’s a lot more solid than the theory that Apple will never add these features because Apple no longer cares about professional users.
[Michael Largé] “I have no doubt Apple will add features to FCPX in future updates, but which features those are I have no idea and quite frankly, I’m not going to preach to others about it until Apple themselves say – and more importantly DO – so.”
That would be fine if everyone where taking an entirely neutral wait-and-see attitude toward Apple’s intentions for the product. But that’s not the case. In a world where a large number of people are advancing a particular theory about Apple’s intentions, what Apple is saying about those intentions to reliable sources should not simply be ignored because it disagrees with that theory.
—
Digital Workflow/Colorist, Nice Dissolve.You should follow me on Twitter here. Or read our blog.
-
Chris Kenny
June 25, 2011 at 7:36 pm in reply to: Future update to add XML, Multicam and importing of old projects?[David Roth Weiss] “So that we are perfectly clear, this discussion between us not one about the issues being debated, but rather the style and tactics of the debate itself. Everyone is entitled to their own POV, but if you’re going relentlessly push a point of view in an open debate by quoting others, you must be prepared to cite reputable and accountable sources, otherwise face the fact that you will called on the matter and your own credibility called into question.
Does this make sense?”
Sure. You’re playing FUD games with respect to information given by Apple directly to several independent sources, and trying to defend this action by acting condescending toward me for pointing it out. It’s all crystal clear.
—
Digital Workflow/Colorist, Nice Dissolve.You should follow me on Twitter here. Or read our blog.
-
[Geoff Dills] “For the life of me I can’t get this to work, so I decided to see how easy it would be to do it manually. So I popped the video and audio to the timeline with sync fairly close. Then after trying it the old way: listen, stop, adjust, rinse and repeat, I discovered I could just let the timeline play and move the video track forward and backward relative to my separate audio track below using the comma/period combo. When the audio stopped echoing I had sync. Very easy.
“You can also create a new compound clip in the browser (see the File menu) and sync audio/video clips there. This is what the auto-sync feature does. It’s sort of like creating a merged clip in FCP 7, except you can open compound clips and edit them like sequences. (Which is something I was always really annoyed you couldn’t do with merged clips in 7.)
—
Digital Workflow/Colorist, Nice Dissolve.You should follow me on Twitter here. Or read our blog.
-
Chris Kenny
June 25, 2011 at 6:13 pm in reply to: Future update to add XML, Multicam and importing of old projects?[David Roth Weiss] “No, that’s denial and projection on your part, attributing to me the very things I’ve called you on, which I do here in the interest of fairness.”
Just so I’m sure I have your argument straight: your claim is that is it more reasonable to believe at this time that Apple does not intend to add these features than that Apple does, because Apple’s statements to (several) media outlets about this subject may be false?
—
Digital Workflow/Colorist, Nice Dissolve.You should follow me on Twitter here. Or read our blog.
-
Chris Kenny
June 25, 2011 at 6:11 pm in reply to: How do I select all clips from a certain point forward or back (like I could in FCP7?)[Dale Robinson] “Hey guys, I am trying to follow your post. I often use the TT tool to select from a point to the end. Move clips down, make some edit decisions and then select TT to move the clips back.
How are we doing this now in FCP X ?”
Use the ‘insert gap’ command (option-W). Gaps work like clips, so you can just drag the gap out to the length you want, or as noted above hit control-D and enter your desired duration. You can then perform overwrite edits within the gap. When you’re done, just select any remaining gap and hit the delete key. (Deletes always ripple in FCP X. If you want the equivalent of a non-ripple delete, it’s ‘Replace With Gap’, which is assigned to forward delete.)
—
Digital Workflow/Colorist, Nice Dissolve.You should follow me on Twitter here. Or read our blog.
-
Chris Kenny
June 25, 2011 at 5:37 pm in reply to: Future update to add XML, Multicam and importing of old projects?[David Roth Weiss] “Again, you cite as fact quotes from three people who cite unnamed officials from Apple, who could just as easily be from Apple’s public relations department, assigned to damage control detail.”
Pogue explicitly said he talked to “product managers”. Anyway, this is just another way of saying “Apple is lying”. Which is possible, but not very likely.
[David Roth Weiss] “Do you know a fact when you see one?”
You’re simply grasping at straws here, to create doubt about information that doesn’t support a particular narrative. Meanwhile, everything piece of information that does support that narrative has an obvious alternative interpretation.
—
Digital Workflow/Colorist, Nice Dissolve.You should follow me on Twitter here. Or read our blog.
-
[Chris Jacek] “Like it, or don’t like it. You should be able to de-activate it when you want to. There’s no reason that a magnetic behavior could not exist in a traditional timeline structure. This would make everyone happy. “
As has been pointed out repeatedly, use the Position tool.
—
Digital Workflow/Colorist, Nice Dissolve.You should follow me on Twitter here. Or read our blog.