Chris Harlan
Forum Replies Created
-
[Bill Davis] “Pretty good for “home movie” software, indeed!”
No, no! It’s VERY good “home movie” software. Don’t sell it short!
-
[Charlie Austin] “I think, going forward – rather than wasting your time justifying anything you do – the best response to anyone who plays the “home movie” card, should be something similar the end of this clip:
“Ask them if they’re a fitness freak?
-
Chris Harlan
October 21, 2013 at 11:32 pm in reply to: FCPX is not used by professionals and only suitable for editing home movies!I’ve never seen that site before. I think its hilarious!
-
[John Davidson] “[Jeremy Garchow] “You will be able to use Tags as “To Do” items for other people like, “please ingest this stuff” or “this stuff has already been imported”.”
I suppose I’d be dreaming for FCPX to automatically import a specific tag. Wouldn’t that be something – like a smart folder on steroids.
“Why not?! I think it would be great,
-
Chris Harlan
October 21, 2013 at 8:07 pm in reply to: FCPX is not used by professionals and only suitable for editing home movies![Charlie Austin] “[TImothy Auld] “You really need to review your Latin.
”Illegitimi non carborundum
:-)”
Don’t copy this disk?
https://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Illegitimi_non_carborundum
-
[Charlie Austin] “How cool would it be to have a “sort” menu for the timeline. Want a “score”? Click a button and boom! it’s all split out. Turn it off if you don’t want it and use the canvas style “blob”. (my current preference). The exciting thing is that I think this is probably quite possible…
“Oh, yes. I agree. That’s very doable. And would be terrific for me. I don’t need to see the core all the time, and would probably totally dig switching into canvas mode.
-
Chris Harlan
October 21, 2013 at 7:10 pm in reply to: FCPX is not used by professionals and only suitable for editing home movies![Andy Branner] “[Chris Harlan] “read the post to which Herb was responding to if you want to see “sad ad hominem, vitriolic attacks.”
LOL… sure.
Like I said… that awful, awful mirror. 🙂
“Just saying “I know you are, but what am I?” over and over again doesn’t fly. Well, at least not in this playground.
-
[Jeremy Garchow] “The director was floored by the feature when I dragged a range, the audio scrubbed with it. This makes selections so much easier and faster. You can actually hear what you are selecting. He also loved how fast the editing was with top/tail and the magnetism.
“Yes, another feature I am jealous of.
[Jeremy Garchow] “So, to each their own. Some see a canvas, some see a lack of a score.
“We always come back to this somehow, don’t we? I wonder if this is actually one of the principal aesthetic dividing lines in X preference. I know it is for David Lawrence, and I’m pretty sure it is for me, but I wonder how true that holds up across the board?
-
Chris Harlan
October 21, 2013 at 7:02 pm in reply to: FCPX is not used by professionals and only suitable for editing home movies![Scott Witthaus] “I was just pointing out that new editors are taking to X much faster than I observed in 7, Apple seemed to do something very right with this new NLE, especially with new unbiased editors, old editors (like me) are usually wary of new things and change, and that history repeats itself! “
Totally get it, Scott. I was actually enjoying your discussion with Oliver.
-
Chris Harlan
October 21, 2013 at 7:00 pm in reply to: FCPX is not used by professionals and only suitable for editing home movies![Andy Branner] ” see I forgot to mention the rather sad ad hominem, vitriolic attacks that come with the territory also, since actual or real argument instead are few and far between once you hold the mirror up too high. :)”
Dude, your lack of self awareness is astounding. Go back and read the post to which Herb was responding to if you want to see “sad ad hominem, vitriolic attacks.” You’re putting off a pretty strong Robespierre vibe, like its the guillotine for anybody who makes a living editing in traditional media.