Forum Replies Created

Page 127 of 282
  • Chris Harlan

    August 29, 2012 at 4:01 pm in reply to: The Patent Thing

    THAT was marvelous!

  • Chris Harlan

    August 29, 2012 at 1:42 am in reply to: The Patent Thing

    [Bill Davis] “You just can’t read anything I write without imbuing it with tone and intent that is simply not there.
    “

    Uh huh.

  • Chris Harlan

    August 28, 2012 at 11:23 pm in reply to: The Patent Thing

    [Mitch Ives] “As for stifling competition, look at any country that has no patent or copyright protections… zero innovation. After all, what’s the point… it’ll only get stolen and you’ll be saddled with all the R&D costs.
    “

    Mitch, I don’t think anyone is arguing that there shouldn’t be patents. I think everyone is simply aghast at how out of hand the system has become.

  • Chris Harlan

    August 28, 2012 at 11:19 pm in reply to: The Patent Thing

    [al ellis] “‘How exactly do you incentivize innovation if you don’t protect it?’
    i dunno, maybe ask tim berners lee that one.”

    ROTFL ™

  • Chris Harlan

    August 28, 2012 at 11:18 pm in reply to: The Patent Thing

    [David Lawrence] “[Bill Davis] “Uh,

    In the first quote the subject is an IDEA.

    In the second quote the subject is a PRODUCT.

    Why is this a difficult concept to grasp?”

    Wrong.
    “

    Careful, now. You need to grasp–however difficult it might be–that Bill has a patent pending on the “condescending “Uh,…” and that he’s not afraid to use it.

  • Chris Harlan

    August 28, 2012 at 3:14 am in reply to: The Patent Thing

    [Jeremy Garchow] ”
    https://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/08/25/apple_v_samsung_verdict_crea...

    Another blog.

    “

    This one, I tend to agree with. I also think the Gizmodo article about all the problems with the verdict is quite interesting:

    https://gizmodo.com/5938219/why-the-apple-v-samsung-ruling-may-not-hold-up

  • Chris Harlan

    August 28, 2012 at 3:13 am in reply to: The Patent Thing

    [Jeremy Garchow] “[Chris Harlan] “[Bill Davis] “Uh, The article I quoted was from the front page of Gizmodo TODAY.”

    I don’t know what you were quoting, but what you linked to is an article from Aug. 2011. See for yourself:”

    Maybe this: https://gizmodo.com/5938193/
    “

    Well, now–that looks right. Undoubtedly what Bill meant to link to.

  • Chris Harlan

    August 28, 2012 at 3:03 am in reply to: The Patent Thing

    [Michael Gissing] “Patent system “out of control”

    Before the verdict an intellectual property professor at the University of California Hastings Law School, Robin Feldman, described the case as unmanageable for a jury.

    “There are more than 100 pages of jury instructions,” Feldman said. “I don’t give that much reading to my law students. They can’t possible digest it.
    “

    And the fact that they’ve found a number of serious errors in the judgement suggests that it might be vacated. Apparently there are places where they awarded millions to Apple for things that they decided were not infringements in other parts of the document.

  • Chris Harlan

    August 28, 2012 at 1:46 am in reply to: The Patent Thing

    [Michael Gissing] “PARC did much more than invent a mouse ‘concept’. They invented the actual mouse as well. It had three buttons. All Jobs did was make it cheap.”

    And, rather stupidly, single-buttoned.

  • Chris Harlan

    August 28, 2012 at 1:45 am in reply to: The Patent Thing

    [Michael Gissing] “You really should listen or read the transcript of the This American Life that Shane talked about Bill, because the problem is the companies using patents to block development and innovation. That is their primary business model and I am not talking about companies like Google or Apple because they are not necessarily the prime movers in this stifling use of patents.
    “

    I second that. The This American Life piece was excellent journalism.

Page 127 of 282

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy