Forum Replies Created

Page 5 of 258
  • Charlie Austin

    October 2, 2017 at 10:23 pm in reply to: Why FCPX?

    [Andrew Kimery] “I’ve handled turnovers for Avid, FCP Legend and PPro and been complimented regardless of what system I used”

    Me too. ☺ And, at least for audio, FCP X is leaps and bounds simpler, easier and faster than the others. Nothing else comes close.

    [Andrew Kimery] “that person probably knew of a lot of third party apps/plugins that most X users probably don’t know about.”

    Anyone who uses FCP X professionally knows about the 3 or 4 third party apps you need. I mean, anyone who’s using *any* NLE professionally should know what’s required to have it do it’s thing right? And no matter what you’re using, at this level everyone hires a “workflow specialist” aka: Really Good AE. 😉

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~I still need to play Track Tetris sometimes. An old game that you can never win~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    October 2, 2017 at 9:58 pm in reply to: Why FCPX?

    [Don Scioli] “I do not see the big deal…I’ve cut 4 future length docs and 1 theatrical horror film on FCPX and never had a problem, worked smooth, quickly and output quality was superb.”

    It’s not a big deal, except in certain areas of the internet and in the “hollywood” (** generic term) hive mind. 😉

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~\”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.\”~
    ~I still need to play Track Tetris sometimes. An old game that you can never win~
    ~\”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented\”~

  • Charlie Austin

    October 2, 2017 at 8:59 pm in reply to: Why FCPX?

    [Michael Hancock] “LOL. I’m not looking to argue – I’m just looking for actual details about what workflows saved time and money. They cite “specific workflows and tools”, but never get specific. Hopefully he’ll pop over with more info.”

    I’m speaking in.. generalities. ☺

    I agree the article is short on detail, and sadly, my memory isn’t good enough to recount anything I was told about this… It came up in conversation while the production was ongoing and I’d get it wrong if I tried to post it. I do know that it ran the gamut from software cost to ingest to edit to color/mix etc. I’ll bug him for some bullet points…

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~\”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.\”~
    ~I still need to play Track Tetris sometimes. An old game that you can never win~
    ~\”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented\”~

  • Charlie Austin

    October 2, 2017 at 8:04 pm in reply to: Why FCPX?

    [Michael Hancock] “I guess we’ll never know.”

    The savings were real, significant, and realized by leveraging FCP X specific workflows and tools. I’ll see if Darren wants to pop in and add some details, but he’s probably not up for the arguments that would erupt. ????

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~\”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.\”~
    ~I still need to play Track Tetris sometimes. An old game that you can never win~
    ~\”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented\”~

  • Charlie Austin

    September 27, 2017 at 5:14 am in reply to: OT: How do you present work-in-progress?

    [Andrew Kimery] “Crazy paranoid.”

    Yeah, that is the real situation, and it’s not like they haven’t got reasons to be that way. Some smaller clients will use “consumer grade” sites, but the biggies… no way. We get audited regularly, and some have former feds on their security teams. It’s… serious. 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~\”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.\”~
    ~I still need to play Track Tetris sometimes. An old game that you can never win~
    ~\”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented\”~

  • Charlie Austin

    September 26, 2017 at 11:30 pm in reply to: OT: How do you present work-in-progress?

    [Walter Soyka] “A rather broad question, but how do you present your WIPs to clients or stakeholders?

    mini DV Tapes via messenger… Oh, wait, we stopped doing that a just few years ago. Hollywood baby!

    Currently we use studio-security approved things like WireDrive, Aspera etc. Or, we use a fiber network to the studios for live playback/editing and they can capture if needed. If it’s live it’s 1080, uploaded stuff is 1080 or 720 mp4’s. Regardless of the source NLE it’s mixed well and has no crappy temp GFX. As we do mostly offline, the pix are watermarked anyway, but when we are “finishing” it all needs to look… final.

    Would love to use Frame I/O but… Hollywood. It’s hard to turn the Titanic

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~\”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.\”~
    ~I still need to play Track Tetris sometimes. An old game that you can never win~
    ~\”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented\”~

  • Charlie Austin

    September 20, 2017 at 2:06 am in reply to: APFS considerations

    [Bill Davis] “And as such, High Sierra 1.0 will be a bit like a FCP X 1.0. Get the concepts out there so users can start learning them.”

    Uh no… not with something as fundamental as the filesystem.

    Thing is, there is a ton of documentation out there, and APFS has been on iOS for quite some time. I’m sure more documentation will appear, but there’s clearly enough to enable Bombich to get CCC ready for HS, and they deal with some seriously low level stuff.

    https://bombich.com/blog/2017/09/14/preparing-upgrade-macos-high-sierra

    https://bombich.com/kb/ccc5/everything-you-need-know-about-carbon-copy-cloner-and-apfs

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~\”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.\”~
    ~I still need to play Track Tetris sometimes. An old game that you can never win~
    ~\”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented\”~

  • Charlie Austin

    September 20, 2017 at 1:06 am in reply to: APFS considerations

    [Michael Gissing] “But is it progress? One article Oliver pointed to said there was no speed improvement with this formatting other than referencing not copying which as he pointed out has potential pitfalls. Is is just change, control or actual improvement? Hard to know with so little documentation out there.”

    So little documentation

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~\”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.\”~
    ~I still need to play Track Tetris sometimes. An old game that you can never win~
    ~\”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented\”~

  • Charlie Austin

    September 19, 2017 at 12:24 am in reply to: APFS considerations

    [Michael Gissing] “Just like blind optimism :)”

    Of course. I think if you did a survey of all the users of any OS, NLE, whatever… you’d find that the blind optimists are in a minuscule minority. I think doom and gloomers are a larger subset. Both are very vocal. 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~\”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.\”~
    ~I still need to play Track Tetris sometimes. An old game that you can never win~
    ~\”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented\”~

  • Charlie Austin

    September 18, 2017 at 11:27 pm in reply to: APFS considerations

    [Andrew Kimery] “Crisis averted… for now. ;)”

    Yep, hold off on panicking. Doom and gloom is timeless though… ????

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~\”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.\”~
    ~I still need to play Track Tetris sometimes. An old game that you can never win~
    ~\”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented\”~

Page 5 of 258

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy