[Charles Alexander]

actually i plan to desaturate and push up contrast?

but 422 is legit?

it is def worth the time/space for the results it provides.

I agree btw on LT vs. HQ – the HQ file sizes are insane.

However question: IF! I did want to create a DCP version of this short would HQ be worth it?

Cartoons and Cereal,

Thx

—
hype.com

[Charles Alexander]

I sorta planned to go into DVDSP for final final export, but assumed Roxio could do it regardless. Haven’t used DVDSP since its first or second version, everything is much more streamlined now.

Already burnt and will test tomorrow.

Done with Roxio for sure.

Thanks Michael , thanks CC forums.

charleskmedia.com

[Charles Alexander]

Nevermind. Got it.

Changed the name of the importName, restarted the computer, faked FCP out to think it was a new tape.

Tricky, tricky tricky.

charleskmedia.com

[Charles Alexander]

[David Roth Weiss ]

I don’t know. I’ve read some thngs on the Color Forum, but then I’ve read an equal number of posts disputing those posts. Nothing is perfect, ans as they say (whoever they are), “your mileage may vary.”

——

I thought you should use Apple ProRes442 if your going to be doing a lot of color correction (‘Color’ or not)…

Regardless I have ten fresh miniDv HD tapes ready for importing and you just answered my last question. Thanks so much Dave. Seriously, really great feedback. I’ll go non-HQ too, just tested it.

Time to start editing. I will show you my finished work.

[Charles Alexander]

Thanks for the quick response.

So whats the difference between HQ and non-HQ? Is it something a deck would pickup but fire wire capture can’t?

Also, why are there packets of people so against Apple ProRes 442?

Algorithmically its the way to go. More flexible, smarter and just yummy in general. I presume?

Am I wrong?

Thanks Dave. I will wait for your response.