Forum Replies Created

Page 37 of 48
  • Carsten Orlt

    January 7, 2008 at 8:00 pm in reply to: AJA io HD so far ?2300 for nothing !

    Nope. And the problems I have are not caused by the ioHD but by FCP.

  • Carsten Orlt

    January 6, 2008 at 9:26 pm in reply to: AJA io HD so far ?2300 for nothing !

    i do owe one and no, I’m not working for AJA 🙂

  • Carsten Orlt

    January 6, 2008 at 1:01 am in reply to: AJA io HD so far ?2300 for nothing !

    so far so good! all problems could be tracked down to FCP and/or Leopard. Some things are not quite right yet, which even a complete reinstall (and yes everything and no restore) couldn’t solve. FCP needs an urgent update for sure, but I feel relatively confident that the ioHD is pretty well setup by AJA.
    my 2 cents :-))

  • Carsten Orlt

    January 5, 2008 at 8:39 pm in reply to: Io HD – Interlaced?

    As far as I know there is no 1080p25 ioHD preset.
    All 1080 presets for 25/50 are interlaced.
    I’m new to the whole HD thing so the following might be wrong. 1080 is always interlaced as of now and there is no true 1080p standard yet. progressive in 1080 is actually what is called PsF.
    The naming conventions in HD are very confusing and it doesn’t help that different companies use different terms for the same thing.
    You can set your 1080i seq to ‘none’ for the field order and that effectively makes it p in the regard that there will be be no field rendering. You have to make some test yourself as I’m not sure yet about all the implications myself. I for instance shot 720p25 and post in 1080i25 (or 50 depending on the manufacturer). It gets interesting when you do speed changes. Because if you keep field rendering on you theoretically end up with an interlaced image….
    Hope this helps (might create more questions too 🙂

  • Carsten Orlt

    January 4, 2008 at 5:57 am in reply to: capture video to audio 2 frames late

    Jeremy

    I really appreciate you taking the time to be the most active on the forum!

    Allow me one little note: If you would have posted this response directly we would have both saved several posts and therefor time.

    I can’t test 720p24 because I only have 720p25 footage. So for now it is something I’ll keep an eye on.

    Anyhow, thanks again!

  • Carsten Orlt

    January 4, 2008 at 5:46 am in reply to: capture video to audio 2 frames late

    [Jeremy Garchow] “You are absolutely right. I like to be thourough. This is the ioHD forum, not the Final CUt forum. “
    i would have never noticed 🙂

    [Jeremy Garchow] “If you capture 720p60, is out of sync?”
    if you would read the answer before you wouldn’t ask this question

    thanks anyway!

  • Carsten Orlt

    January 4, 2008 at 4:46 am in reply to: capture video to audio 2 frames late

    you’re the master of asking questions 🙂

    in the vtr because that’s the only way 720p25 over 60p can be played back by either the 1200 or 1400. and you can’t capture 720p25 over 60p via firewire.

  • Carsten Orlt

    January 4, 2008 at 4:16 am in reply to: capture video to audio 2 frames late

    nope, shot 720p25 over 60p and captured at 1080i25

  • Carsten Orlt

    December 23, 2007 at 9:26 pm in reply to: PAL to NTSC Conversions in FCP/Compressor

    Hi Rafael
    Yes direct from FCP to Compressor. And more then happy results.
    Naturally not for broadcast (I still go to big dub place who have the big guns) but I never had any complaints, problems, bad comments from the NTSC world about my DVD’s.
    Carsten

  • Carsten Orlt

    December 23, 2007 at 1:33 am in reply to: Help: Corrupt QuickTime!

    unfortunately recapture is the only way 🙁

Page 37 of 48

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy