Carlitos
Forum Replies Created
-
I will go back now and keep working on my feature, onlineing on a DS, that will be out in over 4000 theaters in Dec…..
That’s what I call “MATURE”, Oh Yeah!!
.- So what, “Mr. Big Feature Editor”??
My “Gameboy” is newer than yours, I have more games and I play better than You…
-
I will go back now and keep working on my feature, onlineing on a DS, that will be out in over 4000 theaters in Dec…..
.- BUUUUJUUUU!!! I only edit low budget weddings (Two a year) and Cheap, Amateur Porn (I only digitize) BUUUJUUUU!!
-
…..and it was of course cut on an Avid Media Composer…..I will go back now and keep working on my feature, onlineing on a DS, that will be out in over 4000 theaters in Dec…..
.- Thanks god you are making your “BIG MOVIE” with AVID systems (OOOOH!! I’m so impressed!!)
With FCP you’d be finishing it in DEC 2153.
BTW, Why you didn’t make it in FCP, if it’s that good????
“are you really 12 and pretending to be older and wiser….. ”
.- BUUUJUUU!! I’m 12 years old and my movies are not screened in over 4000 theaters!!! BUUUJUUU!!!
-
“I am amazed at the juvinile babble that is BLA BLA BLA BLA…… BLA BLA BLA….cut on an Avid Media Composer…..I think everyone here is starting to see your true colors…… BLA BLA BLA as I can tell from the responses your getting…..are you really 12 and pretending to be older and wiser…..”
.- Is very easy to talk cr”p and ofend without arguments, explanations or pointing errors, like you are doing.
Anyone can do that.
I’m yet to see one single, MATURE and concrete argument (anything better than ” I love my FCP and you don’t know nothing” ) coming from You.
I didn’t insult You in the first place, You were the one who took it personally , saying that I didn’t know what I was talking about” because I criticize (with arguments) FCP, a simple tool, Like AVID, OFFICE or any other.
Is that your concept of “MATURE”???
That’s very sad.
And You are acussing other person to “take it personally and being inmature”!!
“Don’t mess with my “god” FCP, you “Mr. Know-nothing”
PLEEEAAAASE!!!
Well , what can you expect from someone who thinks that a Titler in which you can’t see the background beneath and doesn’t have Border nad Shadows within is a good Titler.
With that kind of expectations…
“I will go back now and keep working on my feature, onlineing on a DS, that will be out in over 4000 theaters in Dec”
.- OH! I didn’t know there was a “Teletubbies” Movie.
-
wow… what a load of BS. Either you have never used DS or you have not used it for long enough.
.- HUH????
“Avid DS is a really good editor.”
.-Well , if You dare to call DS a good editor and really don’t know about Avid MC…
What could I expect?
AVID put some of their interface on it, not long ago. But the REAl duty for the DS is NOT editing. On this is no better than a Media Composer or even an Xpress.
“And btw, FCP does have a great titler, it’s Boris Title 3D and it’s been included for a while now. It doesn’t let you see the background when typing, but who really cares except in discussions like this one…”
.- Well, I care. I don’t like to type blindly. With Avid’s marquee you have the same features (and more) , and
Surprise!!! you can SEE THE BACKGROUND.
The FCP’s titler is the only one titler that you can’t see the backgroun when you are typing.
While this would be OK for a lousy $10 NLE, It is not for a “superb Avid buster” NLE, like FCP pretends to be.
The color correction in FCP is very poor.
There is no Media management in FCP, which is CRUCIAL.
For long, complicated projects with multiple versions, bins and sequences and no time, this is a MUST.
that’s why AVID is the undisputable King in TV stations, large production Houses and, mainly, News.
Nobody else come close.The Multicam implementation in FCP doesn’t even lit a candle to the Avid one.
And I’m yet to see a good (INCLUDED) stabilization in FCP, like the one in Avid (“Shaky Video”, does it rings a Bell?).
I really can’t comprehend what’s the hype about FCP, It’s about the same to Premiere Pro, and people thinks Premiere is crappy.
I work (for money) with an FCP 5.0.4 in a “non plus ultra” top end G5 and the feature I see the most is the “Beachball”.
And I prefer Premiere. At least, a much Better titler.
-
……well, now that you have turned this into a personal attack on me…….
.- Well, You did it first. YOU DID turn this discussion personaly.
It’s a shame you couldn’t realize that.
“…..so when I see someon get on here and just bash FCP without really seeming to have any understanding what the system can do……”
Like I’ve never used FCP, like I do not know what I’m talking about…
Please!!
-
“Curiously, AVID DS used an ATI FIRE video card (ATI is not supported by any other AVID product)”
.- AVID DS (formerly SOFTIMAGE DS) with the Equinox boardset, not AVID DS NITRIS.
Earlier AVID DS and DS HD used a 3Dlabs card.
-
um….not really sure what to say to this post……other than, what are you talking about????
.- Do you think I don’t know what I’m talking about?
I don’t know who you are, but chances are I was editng when you were in Elementary School. I’ve worked on every NLE humanity has invented.
I’m the one who should ask if you know what you’re talking about.
AVID DS is NOT a NLE (although you can edit on it)
Avis DS has NEVER BEEN intended to be an NLE. It must be Terrible to edit a long project on it.
Is a compositing/finishing app more related to Flame or even After Effects than to AVID and it comes from the Canadian Softimage family, not from the Media Composer’s.
The early versions had NOTHING in common with an NLE, Avid has given DS some NLE features
Curiously, AVID DS uses an ATI FIRE video card (ATI is not supported by any other AVID product)
“Im sure Ill get blasted for this post, so be it……”
.- Don’t worry, we understand Newbies.
“I know this wasnt supposed to turn into a Avid vs FCP post, but it always ends up that way, people get so hung up on the tools they use…..like they programed the damn thing and take it personally if anyone points out its faults…..”
.- Where did I take this personally?
For example, The basic titler in FCP is absolutely crappy AND THAT’S A KNOWN FACT, even for the FCP’s fanatics.
It doesn’make the title over the video, You have to type blindly first and later you can move it.
The FCP’s titler doesn’t have Border and Shadows within (that’s really weird) and the interface is odd and unfriendly. You have limited positioning choices when you are making the title (center, left , etc)
Is the worst titler ever.
“so when I see someon get on here and just bash FCP without really seeming to have any understanding what the system can do……”
.- OH, Pleeeeease!! I could give You FCP lessons, kid.
I know FCP deeply.
I’ve worked on it since version 1.2.5.
-
1. Everyone else is doing it.
.-And Everyone that believed FCP was a great system is switching back to Avid, once they get to know the truth about FCP ( Slow, clumsy, offensive Media management (Is there one?), inacceptable Titlers and ridiculously cumbersome ways to do the simplest things)
Premiere Pro 2.0 is a lot better.
I work in a company that tried to switch to FCP. they bought two top notch FCP suites with Xserve, Xraid, AJA IO and all the toys you can imagine. Three months later they bought 5 Adrenalines with a Unity System.
Now, They use the FCP suites for minor projects with long deadlines.
I prefer to pay more for an Avid, even to switch to Premiere Pro, is a better deal.
2. You can add a Kona card.
.- You can also sell it.
-
“Hoo Haw.. Some of us working on large projects have come close to slitting our wrists. In a related vein, Avid has very robust media management. PPro’s is rudimentary in comparison.”
.- Any other NLE media management is rudimentary in comparison.
I never use Premiere unless:
1) The project is very short.
2) Need DVD.