Hi Gary,
Thanks for asking. I think I’ve narrowed it down to the obvious three cameras (Ursa Mini Pro, C300 mk2, FS7ii). If you’ve used all three, great; if you’ve used even just one, I’d like to benefit from your experience, and learn why you chose your camera. The criteria that matter most to me, in order of importance:
Lens Need a parfocal zoom; would also like one or two fast primes. Willing to compromise speed for affordability/light weight (e.g. Sony 18-110, Canon 18-80). Need to assess E-mount vs. PL vs. EF.
Price/resale value
Viewfinder(s) (1) Need visibility in bright sunlight. (2) Option to focus at 1:1 pixels.
Ease of use while shoulder-mounted Balance, weight, access to controls without looking.
Recording media (1) Reliability and robustness. (2) Cost.
Codec – universal appeal I edit about half of what I shoot; I need to be able to hand off material in a variety of formats, from 4K log to efficient, ready-to-edit HD.
Low-light capability Is this the Ursa’s weak point? With Sony or Canon, the best solution might be two cameras, one of them a DSLR that could share a lens with the video camera.
Power consumption
Finally: appropriateness. I do a large variety of jobs: environmental docs, corporate web videos, LOTS of interviews, run-and-gun b-reel, some broadcast. I would like to have a camera which the networks find acceptable but it’s not a necessity for my livelihood.
All three of these cameras are fantastic. Thanks for your insights and perspectives.
Bob