firstly, let me say thank’s for the attention and everyone’s critiques and questions on my poster. (also i’m beg your pardon, because i’ve never responded all of the replies. that’s all because i have no computer that can connect to internet all of time. i’m in indonesia.)
secondly, my goal is get some tips that can be used in editing-process. so the final result is likely a profesional-look edited video. i mean, the picture quality. so, it will look-like the videos that screened on tv or cinema.
in my assumptions, i’ll get some tips or ways, like a post in the cinematography-sections, titled “how to get a film look” (with digital footage), of course.
so, “profesional-look”, in my own definition, is good picture-quality. so, when it (the video) sees by audience, it won’t look like a ordinary edited-video. or maybe, it’s just some footages those were cut, here and there, then recorded into unity.
and my prediction, the quality of the final result were determined by the “way” we take the picture and how the editing-software compresion (in final video) quality is.
now, i know that even creepy footages can be an amazing final-video. not only determined by the editing-software, but also the quality of the editor it self.
ok, thank’s again, for all of the suggestions. i hope that i’ve never “knocked on the wrong door” for learning, by joined in this forum.
regards
bayu prihantoro
a student who wants to learn to be an EDITOR
and i’m not “just a FCP fan who’s stirring here in the PP forum”, like Derek Antonio Serra said.