Ajs006
Forum Replies Created
-
That method wouldn’t work, regardless of time, when you consider the envelopes and FX on tracks.
I guess there really is no option other than to render the whole project, make adjustments, render again. I can’t imagine there isn’t a tool to do this for you, but I suppose not.
Andrew
-
Really?! This is a feature in V7? I’ll have to try that out when I get home. Where do I find this tool in the menus?
Excited,
Andrew -
This is fine if you are looking at just one track. But with a multi-track project, all the audio overlapping, I’m looking for a way to determine the loudest point overall…
Andrew
-
I’m having a similar problem with V7 reading images that V6 had no problem with. I have a lengthy project that contains many still images in JPG and TIF format. The project was created with Vegas 6.0d. Now when I open the project with version 7, it comes across every image file during startup and says that there was an error with each picture, and gives me the standard choices of leaving it offline, or ignoring all errors, etc. The path to the images in correct and says nothing about them being missing; just that there is an error opening them.. no more details.
🙁
andrew
-
hey while we’re on this topic, are the two following class definitions considered equally functionaly and correct? I’ve used both and they operate the same:
a:hover.toplink { … }
a.toplink:hover { … } -
oh my god, i did what you said, as silly as it seems, and now it is working for me. HOW STRANGE. this reminds you that computers are temperamental beasts that sometimes defy the logic and structure that they are supposed to be paradigms of.
the CSS for that one link was not behaving properly in either IE or Firefox on this end, but now it does, just be changing the ordering.
i am absolutely flabbergasted by this bizarre twist.
thanks for sharing!
-andrew
-
Gotta be honest, it doesn’t sound like you know what you are getting into. I used to freelance for a handful of web design clients, and they will not take crap if you don’t know what’s going on.. (and they shouldn’t). I would recommend that you build some sites for some friends of yours for next to nothing (or absolutely nothing) so you can see what it is like to work with a third party, but without the stresses of managing it professionally. Once you get that process down, you can decide if this is something you’re willing to put your reputation on the line for. It is hard to run your own business, even IF you know all the answers to the questions you ask, and more.
Asking about hosting is one of the more rudimentary concepts in web design, and if you don’t have a handle on that yet, you might want to delay your ambitions a while. Otherwise, you may find yourself unexpectedly overwhelmed.
For me, the part about freelancing that I hated the most was having to maintain a site that I already built. I love web design, but the vast majority of the time spent on these sites was long after the site was designed and finished.. it was all the updates all the time for the information presented on its pages. Changes concert schedules, board members, etc.. was a total bore, felt like manual labor to me.
-
Very odd. That is exactly what it is supposed to do, but even after clearing my cache in IE as well as Firefox, it won’t do it. The the CSS classes are working fine, though. There is something about this particular class, as basic as it is, that is not showing up for me at all on either browser. Totally stumped!
-
oh, i realized that the extra
tags are actually openings that were commented out, so actually the XHTML is fine, with all tags properly closed, and thus this isn’t the cause of the original problem regarding the.
anyway, enough squinting for the night.
cheers,
andrew -
interestingly, i ran an XHTML validator on my site, and it didn’t catch any of the unclosed
tags, which is very bizarre considerting that usually these things are very strict. i used the processor at w3.org. why wouldn’t it do that?-a