Forum Replies Created

Page 25 of 242
  • [Peter J. DeCrescenzo] “I can’t consider Adobe’s subscription model, even though I’d probably enjoy using the latest version of Premiere and its more conventional UI & powerful features. But I want to own the software I use, forever.”

    no that’s actually that answer – until the market provides a competitor – ppro is the answer.

    https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics

  • [Charlie Austin] “Here’s the thing, I can cut in whatever I want. “

    baaaa. X has these hard core adherents, but so few speak the truth. They revel in fight.
    Charlie when will we know when you have cut in?

    when can we together turn as one to strangle old FCPX?

    but we light a fire, Suvesh advances through the trees.
    X is unguarded and Herb is, as I understand it, effectively from Jersey.

    https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics

  • [Charlie Austin] “It’s replacement, FCP X, crushes FCP 7, whether you or anyone else like it is another story. “

    that’s entertaining as a sentence given the inevitable implications for you in the near future.

    presumably the next bifurcation of FCPX will be a three dimensional editing space with your favourite clips and tagged tunes attaching themselves to the database in a high speed whirlwind. you read cupertino tea leaves at the end of the edit, and offer small snacks to the gods.

    ok – granted you will barely be in control, but at some point you’ll step back and say – “what wind truth will the primary and the secondary storyline perform today? Is my mind at one with the apple deep instruction?”

    Is your arm bound to your leg and are you hopping around like a lunatic? that – at least in terms on the timeline, is an issue for X.

    You’re all hopping around on one leg with tribal feathers in your hair constantly shouting that everything is ok here.

    it’s not.

    https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics

  • [Herb Sevush] “From my point of a view it’s a wankel rotary engine”

    rather. also, the bbc thing is overstated I think. That is a city, and in a village in that city, regarding factual, certain people are being trained.

    5,000 licenses of creative suite 5.5 premiere pro were bought and we all now know that meant nothing. BBC extruded those licenses as a digestive function. although BBCWW is going ppro cc as a mortal lock.

    the point, if we’re going to get emotional, lies with the essential chi of FCPX, it’s reason for being, and how it breathes. Does it breathe like pages, does it breathe like aperture, does it breathe like FCP 7, does it breathe like shake or colour, or any other software adventure apple ever undertook transitioning to the most powerful corporation on earth.

    asking if FCPX is going to be ok and well tended for is like asking an olympian dragon if they’re going to make it rain. Apple is that far in the sky, and they’ve been that way for a while. They are god level corporate capricious, and if you’re confused, ask yourself, as you hold your new special magnetic powers, whether the aperture people are currently left holding their own… well, finish that sentence.

    gods do get bored. It’s a hallmark.

    https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics

  • Aindreas Gallagher

    December 30, 2014 at 9:15 pm in reply to: What do you edit with?

    always these boys:

    https://provideocoalition.com/images/uploads/lightworks_8.jpg

    tank of a thing. I remember an editor saying that what he loved was you could really hammer the hell out of them – yank the transport, hammer the buttons. I never used the system much, but there was a really satisfying spring resistance to the transport controller. We bought some generic controllers for fcp, but they really weren’t the same…

    https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics

  • Aindreas Gallagher

    December 23, 2014 at 12:14 am in reply to: Evidently, some of this is quantified.

    [Dennis Radeke] ” You are not compelled to subscribe,”

    are you joking under god. you just all broke us under your knee. you used every leverage you had to break your previous customers into tenants. you literally constructed a scenario where you could hear each arm bone break.

    those bones break. mine did. congratulations to you: a constructed olive oil for adobe software there.
    your days must be filled with the sound of human arms breaking.

    such grand royal days for adobe.

    half point: i pushed that angry as far as you could – this is quite some cow barn.

    *edit* – ok possibly overly florid language used there but well…

    https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics

  • Aindreas Gallagher

    December 17, 2014 at 12:19 am in reply to: Quantifiable evidence

    [Andrew Kimery] “Scott Witthaus] “How different is CC from CS6? I find PP in CS6 to be a pain. I use it only when I have to (clients shop)””

    honest to god but come on. who doesn’t know where ppro has gone?

    why do people think (local shortform) disney, and viacom, and bbc worldwide, and ITV studios (actually for ITV the whole barn) nominated Adobe Premiere Pro going forward.

    it is the proposed future editing system. ITV just flushed avid down the toilet. ppro will eat into long form over the next half decade.

    that is what that is. X is a foreign exchange student, as it ever was.

    https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics

  • Aindreas Gallagher

    December 16, 2014 at 11:03 pm in reply to: Quantifiable evidence

    barely off 7 – I get that, but adobe have loaded near a Tutankhamun’s tomb for editors at this point. It’s crazily effective.
    How and when you editorially interact an ongoing ppro edit with AE is, in itself, super interesting relative to 7.

    that’s leaving aside the native operations and edit stuff. it’s a wicked timeline.

    https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics

  • Aindreas Gallagher

    December 16, 2014 at 1:22 am in reply to: Quantifiable evidence

    [Tim Wilson] “I don’t think either of these can be overstated.”

    there’s not a few trying to figure out the exact point a draft composite ppro selection gets sent to AE for pre-comp that works best going forward for final edit.

    you’d also say if someone large is really all in right now, ppro at facility level is currently a rollercoaster to put it mildly.

    https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics

  • Aindreas Gallagher

    December 16, 2014 at 12:33 am in reply to: Quantifiable evidence

    to say again but – even in PR shops that will debate client billing at a few hundred quid level in open office conversations – it’s ppro. X doesn’t win that end because it doesn’t play with the standing AE assets or the available talent pool. given the cards adobe have there is almost no way for X plus the hobbled motion to mean anything. also X doesn’t have near enough editors or shops employing it. off all that – seventeen percent is actually surprisingly strong in a way.

    https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics

Page 25 of 242

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy