Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy XDCAM to ProRes422HQ-Timeline or Compressor?

  • XDCAM to ProRes422HQ-Timeline or Compressor?

    Posted by Paul Campbell on May 6, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    Hi, guys. My subject line pretty much says it all. I’ve got some XDCAM 1080 footage that’s destined for a SD progressive 422HQ project. Is it just as good to simply drop the footage into my timeline and render, or should I really be using Compressor to convert to 422?

    Thanks,

    Paul

    Rafael Amador replied 17 years ago 5 Members · 20 Replies
  • 20 Replies
  • Chris Borjis

    May 6, 2009 at 4:53 pm

    resize it with compressor.

    fcp is bad at resizing.

  • Alan Smith

    May 6, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    Use Media Manager or Batch Export from the Final Cut Browser. Here is a great article related to this issue from Ken Stone.

    https://www.kenstone.net/fcp_homepage/when_to_stay_native.html

    Alan Smith

    Alan Smith
    Media317

    Check out my blog – https://media317.com

  • Paul Campbell

    May 6, 2009 at 7:13 pm

    Thanks, guys. Alan, I’ve not used the Batch Export before. I’ve used Compressor a lot. Would you say one is better than the other?

  • Chris Borjis

    May 6, 2009 at 7:26 pm

    you can drop the xdcam source files right into compressor without fcp.
    be sure your preset has the resize filter set for highest quality.

    I would be cautious with media manager, its still not quite
    working the way it should.

    I don’t know how you could resize with batch export.

  • Paul Campbell

    May 6, 2009 at 8:14 pm

    Chris, should I set Frame Controls to “On”, like when I convert interlaced to progressive? I’ve found this to really increase the file size.

  • Chris Borjis

    May 6, 2009 at 11:57 pm

    frame controls should always be on and set to best for resizing if you want a decent downconvert.
    even then its not quite as good as a kona hardware downconvert, especially with 720P to 480 SD.

    it will make no difference in the file size, but the time to compress
    will be much longer.

  • Rafael Amador

    May 7, 2009 at 2:53 am

    Hi Paul,
    I’m still recommending FC for downscalling.
    Drop the XDCAM in the Proress sequence and don’t forget set “render in High Precission” and “Motion Render: BEST”.
    I’ve been making some serious (?) test comparing FC an Compressor for Up/down-scaling.
    For any upscalling Compressor clearly beats FC off course, but for downscalling using Compressor is just a waist of time. IMHO.
    Rafael

    http://www.nagavideo.com

  • Paul Campbell

    May 7, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    Thanks guys, for the tips. Chris, if there was anyway to do a Kona downconvert, I’d definitely do that…but I’m dealing with XDCAM footage from an SxS card, so I have to use the Sony XDCAM transfer software to convert my clips to .mov’s. There’s no option in that software to do a downconversion, unfortunately.

  • Rafael Amador

    May 7, 2009 at 2:40 pm

    If you could play the SxS from an EX-1/3 through the HD/SD-SDi to the Kona would be the best option for sure.
    rafael

    http://www.nagavideo.com

  • Paul Campbell

    May 7, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    Hi, Rafa. Do you mean instead of removing the SxS card from the camera, just leave it in and play the footage back from the camera to capture it into the Kona? Didn’t know you could do that. Hmmm…

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy