-
x 2 (because I was told by the cow that I couldn’t use so many caps
-
Wow – extremely cool and useful!
-
Big check on all points also, Ronny. Great write-up!
And a little birdy tells me, that they (CoreMelt) are working on getting the tracker to work with masks AND the 3D text! So it should become interesting.
– RK
____________________________________________________
Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich! -
[Robin S. Kurz] “And a little birdy tells me, that they (CoreMelt) are working on getting the tracker to work with masks AND the 3D text! So it should become interesting.”
I do hope the bird is right 🙂
-
[Steve Connor] “I do hope the bird is right :)”
Well… let’s put it this way: the birdy works there. 😀
It may even be public knowledge, just not sure, so I ain’t namin’ names. 😉
– RK
____________________________________________________
Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich! -
[Aindreas Gallagher] “They chose to lead with nineties 3D brass glint photoshop titles four years in.”
https://www.motionvfx.com/mplugs-79.html
Yeah… totally 90’s. No one wants that kinda crap. Especially not in realtime and fully customizable. Couldn’t agree more.
– RK
-
Interesting. For it to work well, it would have to be a full 3D camera tracker, which is not something Mocha tracking is set up to do. I wonder if it would be a whole new plug-in. I’d buy it pretty quick as I’m tired of having to go out to AE to do camera tracking.
-
[Brett Sherman] “which is not something Mocha tracking is set up to do.”
Not sure if you’re talking about the “actual” mocha tracker (which it in fact is set up to do that i.e. has a camera tracker) or TrackX. But if TrackX, how would you need a “full camera tracker” to track titles? You can already track titles with TrackX.
https://youtu.be/-tgD5tfasuk?t=4m41s
(this SHOULD start at 4:41)You could even do it with Motion’s POINT tracker if you like for that matter.
https://youtu.be/mWwZPRIyeWc?t=18m35s
(and this at 18:35)Only in that case NONE of your tracking points (assuming you have more than one) can of course leave the frame.
Being planar, even the current TrackX does a superb job in comparison. Only the perspective of a 3D title won’t change during the track, which obviously looks weird. That’s the only missing part.
– RK
____________________________________________________
Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.
-
Will these start to eliminate the need to go to Resolve? At least reduce the need? Meaning, X, CF and Corel?
Scott Witthaus
Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
1708 Inc./Editorial
Professor, VCU Brandcenter -
[Scott Witthaus] “Will these start to eliminate the need to go to Resolve?”
That obviously depends entirely on your actual needs. Color Finale is clearly no comparison to Resolve past a certain (low) point.
– RK
____________________________________________________
Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich! -
Oh, and I think it’s fairly safe to say, that Apple didn’t use anything but the Motion tracker in this: https://images.apple.com/media/us/mac/motion-5/2015/tour/3d-titles/motion5-3d-titles-cc-us-20150414_r848-9dwc.mov
😉
– RK____________________________________________________
Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Vimeo framework” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up