Activity › Forums › Adobe After Effects › Wrapping stills around 3d… sort of.
-
Wrapping stills around 3d… sort of.
Posted by Simon Mountney on April 22, 2013 at 2:23 pmHi all, I hope somebody can help me out with this. I have a piece of film footage of a droplet of liquid falling off the side of a glass, shot with a macro lens so the droplet takes up half of the screen, and the client wants images to wrap around the droplet and rotate around it at the droplet moves. Is there something simple I’m missing or do I need to create some sort of displacement map of the droplet, or somehow make a 3d shape layer to adhere the moving images to on a layer on top of the droplet footage? I’m at a bit of a loss on this one and any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers
Simon
Simon Mountney replied 12 years, 7 months ago 5 Members · 7 Replies -
7 Replies
-
Joseph W. bourke
April 22, 2013 at 2:44 pmIt sounds as if this is a tracking job. You need to track the droplet, then create the image matrix (will it be the shape of the droplet, or sphere, or cylinder?), then apply the tracking data to the image matrix (pre-comped). The trick is going to be getting the images to go behind the droplet – if I get your description correctly.
If I were doing this, I would use Red Giant Planespace – it will create all sorts of matrices – cylindrical, spherical, plus control them, so you can create a “front” and a “back”. I think you’re going to have to create a roto mask (difficulty depending on how sharp the droplet edges are) which will allow you to create a distortion map which will mimic the distortion and diffraction caused by passing behind the droplet.
Joe Bourke
Owner/Creative Director
Bourke Media
http://www.bourkemedia.com -
Simon Mountney
April 22, 2013 at 3:40 pmI don’t think that I’ll need to see the content through the droplet, so only the front face would need to be created. The moving images won’t need to be seen behind the droplet but they will need to look like they’re disappearing behind it around one side, with other images appearing from the other side. I’m a bit unsure how to apply a matrix in this case. I can see why tracking the droplet makes sense as it would ensure that whatever layer is above it conforms to the appropriate position, but I’m not sure how to apply a semi 3d layer over the top, nor how to have a still image move over it. Sorry for sounding a bit backwards.
-
Ridley Walker
April 22, 2013 at 3:59 pmFor the distortion and displacement you’ll need a 3rd party tool like FreeForm.
You can download a trial version here to see if you can achieve the look you want.
https://www.mettle.com/freeform-pro/
-
Chris Bobotis
April 22, 2013 at 6:33 pmThanks Ridley. Or for sopmething as simple as that you can use this version: https://www.mettle.com/freeform-v2/
HTH
Cheers,
Chris
mettle.com -
Darby Edelen
April 22, 2013 at 8:48 pmYou should also be able to get a good result using the built-in Distort > Displacement Map although the set up may be involved. You’d have to create a matte for the drip and create a psuedo-normal map from it in order to get good results.
Still, if the drip wouldn’t be hard to matte that’s the way I’d approach it.
Darby Edelen
-
Simon Mountney
April 23, 2013 at 9:41 amMany many thanks, I’ll give both options a go and get back with results when time permits. Much appreciated guys!
Cheers
Simon
-
Simon Mountney
October 9, 2013 at 4:33 pmHi all, firstly, thank you for the assistance and suggestions. I’m pleased with the result and so’s the client. The shot can be seen at around the 34 second mark. Thanks again for all your help.
Kindest regards
Simon Mountney
Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Vimeo framework” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up