-
Workflow Question: Grading
Hey all, first post here.
I’m a photojournalist, but have been using Final Cut Pro for about a year. (https://vimeo.com/9002132) I shoot on a 5d mark II and I usually use mpeg streamclip to transcode to prores 422 and then edit in final cut and grade with magic bullet looks.
Recently I’ve started shooting with a much flatter less saturated look. I’ve noticed that magic bullet really doesn’t do well with this footage, shadow detail and lower mid-tones look muddy and the over all color just isn’t realistic. The same clip just does much better in Adobe After Effects. I’m attributing this to After Effects being a more image based program and Final Cut being more video oriented.
Ok, so here’s what I’m up against.
I can’t afford Automatic Duck, and I’m seriously considering learning how to use Premiere so that i can transfer projects to After Effects.
Are there any other users who have seen the same image quality difference between Final Cut and After Effects? Is this workflow sound? Ie. does it make sense to shoot flat, edit, and then grade aggressively in After Effects?
The 5d shoots H264 footage which is somewhat similar to a jpeg. As a photographer, If I had to shoot jpegs, i would really need to nail exposure and color balance while shooting because of how hard it is to correct without artifacting and other unpleasantness. While shooting video I do the same but I’m assuming it’s better to shoot flat because a “film look” has a lot less contrast than a photo and is color balanced in a different way as well.Any and all advice is much appreciated.
Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Vimeo framework” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.