-
Will USB3 solve the imac’s limitations?
I currently have a 3-year-old imac that is showing its age a little bit. I edit and use Color/occasionally Motion. I’m learning Nuke. Not for broadcast so far, but could be in the future.
I can get a second-hand 8 core mac pro at pretty much half the list price. I’m really surprising myself by having doubts.
for the same money I can get a refurb i5 imac with the following advantages:
1. 27 inch screen
2. It’s faster, at least in these tests
https://www.macworld.com/reviews/product/343881/review/27inch_imac_core_i5266ghz.html
3. It has a 1TB HD compared to the mac pro’s 640GB
4. One-year warrantyIt seems to me the two main disadvantages are:
1. Lack of expandability. This is partly offset by the fact that where I live (Hong Kong) imacs have amazing resell value and sell very quickly. If I need more power/better GPU in the future I can sell it and go back to the big glass-fronted sweet shop for a new one, or a refurb.
2. I/O. The imac is limited by firewire 800.So my question is: When better I/O hits the imac, will it make the mac pro less of a necessity?
I assume it will remove the bottleneck for external RAID. I’m a one-man operation so no plans for network SAN, whatever that is. Will it also enable external video monitoring setups? With a card of course. In this area I am completely ignorant. I’d love to have an FSI (or a panny pro) but realistically, it’s not going to be this year whichever computer I get.If USB3/lightpeak will eventually solve these problems, then I think I will stick with imacs and wait it out. If not, I may as well get the mac pro now.
I realise that there is a professional image aspect to having a mac pro, but as I am currently editing in my underpants surrounded by empty beer cans I don’t think that’s really a consideration.
Thanks!
Andy
