Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums DaVinci Resolve Wich LUT for LOG to LIN Rec 709 conversion ?

  • Wich LUT for LOG to LIN Rec 709 conversion ?

    Posted by Pierre-loic Precausta on April 29, 2011 at 12:00 pm

    Hi all,

    I have a DPX LOG sequence and I have to convert to REC 709 DPX Sequence or Prores.
    Wich LUT in DaVinci Resolve can I use ?

    Joseph Owens replied 15 years ago 5 Members · 5 Replies
  • 5 Replies
  • Joseph Owens

    April 29, 2011 at 7:41 pm

    LUT for Log to Lin?

    This is not necessarily a colorspace transform, so I’d be surprised if it were treated as a LUT process. Its more of a re-scaling calculation, but I’m just a beginner with Resolve, myself, making the transform from Apple COLOR. Do I need a LUT for that?

    jPo

    You mean “Old Ben”? Ben Kenobi?

  • Illya Laney

    April 29, 2011 at 10:21 pm

    Joseph Owens
    “but I’m just a beginner with Resolve, myself, making the transform from Apple COLOR”

    Glad to see you started using it. I’m looking forward to more of your input on the forum.

    twitter.com/illyalaney

  • Mike Most

    April 30, 2011 at 2:45 am

    …or you could go here:

    https://www.arridigital.com

    select Technical, then LUTs, and build one for free. Just make it LogC to Video, extended range on both input and output, and no color matrix (1D LUT). You can output for just about any system out there, including DaVinci.

  • John Sellars

    April 30, 2011 at 3:56 pm

    And be sure to download the Color Processing White Paper here:

    https://www.arridigital.com/downloads

  • Joseph Owens

    April 30, 2011 at 4:03 pm

    I am still straddling the Apple world — just riding that pony until it needs to be put out of its misery.
    I disagree with some of the commentary that has grown up around the FCPX trial-balloon preview that software is somehow an “investment”. It can’t be — although I know there are accounting tools that assist with writing it down — it really should be considered a fixed cost of doing business. I have to keep telling myself that my outlay for FT2K way back when was part of a capitalization that got the application to where it became functional. Anyway, this is way off topic.

    Interesting link to the Arri site. Good lord, they make unbelievable cameras — sometimes bulletproof, sometimes fireproof, if you saw the charred, but still functioning remains of that body at NAB. Thanks Mike! Good to see you around here, too!

    jPo

    You mean “Old Ben”? Ben Kenobi?

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy