Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Why shoot in HDV?

  • Why shoot in HDV?

    Posted by Fcpinnfla on September 20, 2006 at 8:32 pm

    My reason for asking is how many of you output back to HDV? Do you take your master HDV tape to a duplication house and have it bumped to a HD format?

    If you are making DVDs from your HDV timeline, how much better is the quality than shooting DV or SD for that matter? Just curious as I haven’t shot or edited in HDV yet. I do have a HVR M-15U but have only used it for DV so far.

    Thanks!

    Ed Dooley replied 19 years, 8 months ago 4 Members · 6 Replies
  • 6 Replies
  • Ed Dooley

    September 20, 2006 at 9:17 pm

    Haven’t done it myself yet, but there are lots of posts here and other forums/lists where people say they are
    generally mastering out to HD with a rented deck, or in the case of DVDs, the most common opinion
    is that shooting in HDV and downconverting gives a much better final SD image for DVD than shooting in SD.
    Ed

  • Peter Wiggins

    September 21, 2006 at 12:02 am

    [Ed] “the most common opinion
    is that shooting in HDV and downconverting gives a much better final SD image for DVD than shooting in SD.
    Ed”

    Whoa Ed!

    That is a wide ranging statement. Give me a Digibeta shoot, 10bit edit & DVD master & put that up against the same in HDV.
    Might look vaguely similar until something moves 🙂

    Peter

    Free Motion Templates

    peterwiggins.com

  • Michael Gissing

    September 21, 2006 at 3:37 am

    I see a few reasons to shoot HDV. Firstly when you want a cost effective HD final product for broadcast. Secondly when you want a small discreet handy cam shoot for standard def. Thirdly when you want to get as close to SD digi beta but can’t afford digi beta.

    If you want to shoot the best you can in standard def, then digi beta wins. The Canon HDV comes closest to digi beta in SD and also closest to HDCam in HD. But HDV is not the best format for either SD or HD, just the most cost effective.

  • Fcpinnfla

    September 21, 2006 at 11:10 am

    Thanks for the responses…

    Do any of you output from your HDV timeline on FCP to a rented HD deck? Curious as to which deck (format) and workflow issues.

  • Ed Dooley

    September 21, 2006 at 1:25 pm

    Sorry Peter, maybe I wasn’t being clear enough. I was comparing shooting in HDV mode and downconverting to DV (SD) in the same camera.
    I think that’s what the question was mostly about, but he may have also meant to compare *any* SD (including Digibeta)
    to HDV.
    Ed

    [Peter Wiggins] “[Ed] “the most common opinion
    is that shooting in HDV and downconverting gives a much better final SD image for DVD than shooting in SD.
    Ed”

    Whoa Ed!

    That is a wide ranging statement. Give me a Digibeta shoot, 10bit edit & DVD master & put that up against the same in HDV.
    Might look vaguely similar until something moves :)”

  • Ed Dooley

    September 21, 2006 at 1:28 pm

    This is definitely one of those “do a search” times. If you do a “HDV to HD” search of posts, in the AJA IO, AJA Kona, FCP,
    Broadcast Video, High-end HD, and HDV forums, you’ll find lots and lots of answers to that.
    Ed

    [fCPinNFLA] “Do any of you output from your HDV timeline on FCP to a rented HD deck? Curious as to which deck (format) and workflow issues.”

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy