Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Panasonic Cameras Why is the XL-2 more expensive?

  • Why is the XL-2 more expensive?

    Posted by Dananderiq on September 26, 2005 at 2:21 am

    I have a question about the DVX vs. XL-2 issue. I know this was already addressed with the very comprehensive review from dvxuser.com and I’m posting it below for reference.

    https://www.dvxuser.com/V3/showthread.php?t=27704

    But pretty much this article claims the dvx a superior camera to the xl-2 except for that fact that the xl-2 looks more impresive and has a longer lense. Part of this doesn’t make sense though.

    1. This article came from a DVX user group and the article seems to potentially be full of bias.
    2. The XL-2 is $1500 more than the dvx, list price. Why? If the DVX is a better, more professional camera, why the price inflation on the canon? It can’t just be for the option to buy more canon lenses. That doesn’t justify $1500.

    I know this is a dvx user group too and everyone here at least likes if not loves their dvx. Believe me, I do too! But I really wanted to get to the bottom of this. thanks

    Noah Kadner replied 20 years, 7 months ago 2 Members · 1 Reply
  • 1 Reply
  • Noah Kadner

    September 26, 2005 at 2:41 am

    You do get the ability to interchange lenses and native 16:9. Other than that the price descrepancy is pure conjecture- profit perhaps?

    Noah

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy