Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy WHY is FCP exporting my sequences as 4:3 ??

  • WHY is FCP exporting my sequences as 4:3 ??

    Posted by Josh Evans on March 12, 2009 at 9:19 am

    Never had this problem before.

    I am working in PAL DV, 16:9. I look in the settings of my sequences and it says the ration is 720 by 576, but pixel aspect ratio is 16:9. That must have something to do with it?

    My sequence plays as 16:9 in FCP, but when i export QT files and select “Export using current sequence settings” it is squeezing out 4:3 babies. Can anyone help? It definitely seems like it would be an easy fix but im overlooking something obvious.

    Thanks alot.

    [Edit]

    Oh and by the way yes I have done the workaround of opening them in QT Pro then changing the movie properties to make them 16:9. But then when i do converts using MPEGSteamclip, it causes terrible interlacing problems. No idea whats going on now.

    Jason Porthouse replied 17 years, 2 months ago 5 Members · 6 Replies
  • 6 Replies
  • Rafael Amador

    March 12, 2009 at 9:39 am

    Hi Josh,
    The problem is that when you change the “Visual setting’ you are really changing the properties of the movie.
    The movie will show in FC as 1024×576 Square pixels and off course will need to be rendered if set in a PAL Anamorphic sequence.
    This didn’t happens in previous QT versions.
    I don’t think there is any solution. Set it 1024×576 for display, and when you want to re-process it, back to 720×576.
    The Apple codecs have not a flag for Anamorphic pixels and QT interpret all the pixels as Square.
    rafael.
    rafael

    http://www.nagavideo.com

    (and here some clips for the friends: https://www.vimeo.com/2694745 )

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Vimeo framework” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  • Josh Evans

    March 12, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    Oh….

    so when i start a new sequence, i should manually set it to 1024 by 576? I was just dropping the footage in, and letting it automatically size the sequence to the footage, to avoid the need for rendering.

    or should i just go apple prores 422? Isnt that like a golden solution to everything?

    Thanks for your reply!

  • Tom Wolsky

    March 12, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    Do not do that. That is not the way anamorphic video works. Edit it properly and export it properly based on where you’re trying to go to. As far as ProRes, that’s up to you and depends on what you’re doing and what your needs are.

    All the best,

    Tom

    Class on Demand DVDs “Complete Training for FCP6,” “Basic Training for FCS2” and “Final Cut Express Made Easy”
    Author: “Final Cut Pro 5 Editing Essentials” and “Final Cut Express 4 Editing Workshop”

  • Anders Haavie

    March 12, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    This is a totally normal behaviour. I work in dvpal 16×9 all the time.. and your qt files will always end up in 4×3. You have to manually change the aspect ratio in QT to get it right (this will be very quick and not require you to make a new file.) In quicktime go to Movie Properties. Video.. and 1024×576.

    Xraid-Xserve-Xsan-Xeverything

  • Rafael Amador

    March 12, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    !024×576 SQ pixels is not Standard PAL.
    If you change the Properties to 1024×576 is possible that you would be able to use it in a 1024×576 sequence, but I don’t know the results.
    Think that the movie is not really 1024×576.
    Is just QT who is displaying like that.
    About Proress, as any other Apple codec, it have no Anamorphic flag.
    BlackMagic codesc used to do it.
    Rafael

    http://www.nagavideo.com

    (and here some clips for the friends: https://www.vimeo.com/2694745 )

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Vimeo framework” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  • Jason Porthouse

    March 12, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    Josh,

    All PAL video is 720×576, (ok not all but for these purposes) there is no such thing as 1024×576. Hold that thought… for PAL VIDEO…

    So your choice is anamorphic or not. As you’ve found out, this will display as tall and thin when looked at in Quicktime – so, if youe final deliverable is a computer file the best way is to manually create a 16:9 (1024×576, 512×288 etc) quicktime/avi/flv

    If you’re authoring DVD keep it anamorphic (720×576) for your encode and make sure your DVD project is 16:9, it’ll be fine.

    If you’re getting interlaced artifacts, I’d expect that looking at an interlaced QT on a computer monitor. Again, what’s your end deliverable? DVD? Live with it, or create a de-interlaced copy QT for client approval if you need to. The artefacts won’t be seen on a television screen played from the DVD.

    HTH

    Jason

    _________________________________

    Before you criticise a man, walk a mile in his shoes.
    Then when you do criticise him, you’ll be a mile away. And have his shoes.

    *the artist formally known as Jaymags*

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy