Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums DaVinci Resolve Which Mac for resolve?

  • Which Mac for resolve?

    Posted by Kris Anderson on December 23, 2010 at 5:21 am

    I’m about to hit the button on a Mac resolve system but wanted to know if there was any substantial performance hit when choosing an 8 core Mac over a 12 core? Like, anything that’s a deal breaker?

    Joseph Owens replied 15 years, 4 months ago 3 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • Luke Maslen

    December 23, 2010 at 5:38 am

    Hi Kris,

    Compressed video formats (e.g. ProRes, r3d, XDCAM, DNxHD) use a lot of CPU power. If you are working with lots of compressed material, then the more CPUs the better. The GPU cards perform image processing once the CPUs have done the job of decompressing the compressed video files. If you’re mainly working with uncompressed video then the 12 cores are of less benefit as they won’t be used so much.

    If you’re using a RED Rocket card to work with r3d files, then the RED Rocket has already taken the load off your CPUs so you won’t need so many cores in the Mac Pro. However if you work with r3d files without a RED Rocket, then I would definitely recommend the 12 core model for processing r3d files.

    Regards,

    Luke Maslen
    Blackmagic Design

  • Kris Anderson

    December 23, 2010 at 5:48 am

    Thanks Luke.

    I plan to go with a RR card, a Cubix extender, the BMD video card and the HBA for my Maxx Digital array, along with the recommended GUI/GPU configs.

    Re: the Cubix…. any suggestion on which to get? Ideally it would be as expandable as possible.

  • Luke Maslen

    December 23, 2010 at 6:39 am

    Hi Kris,

    We’ve only tested the one model of extender at the moment and you can find it and the other related components in the Resolve for Mac Config Guide on our website. My guess is the other models would also work fine but we haven’t tested them and can’t be sure. The unit we’ve tested is a 4 slot model and should work fine with your proposed cards although we haven’t specifically tested your model of HBA card.

    Regards,

    Luke Maslen
    Blackmagic Design

  • Joseph Owens

    December 23, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    Regarding the Cubix PCIe extender chassis, it doesn’t really seem like there is much of a functional difference between them, reading between the lines on their website. At this point, I’m really only weighing the pros and cons of the rackmount and Desktop4 upgraded to x16, as several clients have already indicated interest in proceeding into the the world of 3D, and of course the more GPUs, the better. And the price difference moving up for expandibility seems to favor the poly-slot offerings for starters.

    jPo

    You mean “Old Ben”? Ben Kenobi?

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy