-
Which is faster, TB3 (USB-C) or SAS?
I had a scare over the weekend that my ATTO R680 was crapping out. That’s a 6 GB dual channel SAS card that’s been discontinued in favor of 12 Gb PCIe cards. Turns out the R680 is fine, but it got me to thinking what’s next to replace it when it finally dies. It’s attached to an Enhance E8 enclosure (discontinued) with 8 – 12 TB Seagate EXOS enterprise drives that have four years left on warranty.
I’m wondering whether I should consider a USB-C enclosure next, or stick with another ATTO PCIe mini-SAS solution.
I have an 8-drive QNAP NAS I use strictly as a backup to my ATTO RAID, mostly because the aging ATTO RAID smokes my newish (1 year old) QNAP in AJA System Test of drive speed. I’m not sure why that is. Since TB3 is purported to be 40 Gb/s (or 5 GB/s), seems like I should be getting faster IO than 800 or 900 MB/s on the QNAP that I’m getting. Both RAIDs are at RAID 6. My ATTO RAID gets between 1200 and 1800 MB/s on AJA Speed Test – up to twice as fast as the TB3 attached QNAP.
Does that sound right to you experts?