-
which codec is better? 10-bit full-raster codec-Apple ProRes 422HQ or Panasonic AVC Intra 100?
Hi there,
Can I get someone to weigh in on which codec is better? 10-bit full-raster Apple ProRes 422HQ or Panasonic AVC Intra 100?
I guess its a whole workflow question though too.
SHooting on the HPX3700 and could either shoot AVC Intra 100 to P2 cards or get a AJA ki pro and record to its 10-bit full-raster ProRes 422HQ.
I would rather just shoot to the P2 cards for many reasons but what sequence settings would I want to use to optomise the AVC Intra 100 footage? Would I be wanting to edit in Pro Res HQ anyway and going through the hassle of transcoding everything to ProRes HQ after already rewrapping the avc intra100 into a QT wrapper for FCP? How many copies of this stuff am I supposed to have? Even if I delete one of these redundant versions of each file where is my time savings of the tapeless workflow if I’m rewrapping via log and transfer and transcoding via compressor??
I’ve recently heard of MXF4mac but still wonder what sequence setting I should be using if I’m starting with ACV Intra 100 and wanting to edit the best available content.
Thanks!