Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums DaVinci Resolve When NOT to use Resolve for creating offline media

  • When NOT to use Resolve for creating offline media

    Posted by Jim Bachalo on April 17, 2013 at 5:23 pm

    Watch the excellent ‘The Ticket’ behind the scenes and it seems that the offline Avid files were all created as a first step in resolve

    https://vimeo.com/40316692
    at 7 minutes

    Is this considered a ‘normal’ workflow?

    ie as a best practice should you normally use Resolve for ingesting source files and creating your offline media for editing?

    I’ve read elsewhere that FCPX has problems working with proxy footage created using Resolve.

    Javier Sanchez replied 13 years ago 4 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • Joseph Owens

    April 17, 2013 at 7:05 pm

    [jim bachalo] “Is this considered a ‘normal’ workflow?

    ie as a best practice should you normally use Resolve for ingesting source files and creating your offline media for editing?”

    Best practice is to adopt an E-E workflow that makes everybody’s job seamless. That will vary, depending on everyone’s preferences — what camera you are shooting with, what codec it produces, where the dailies are going and what the best format will be for storage, data throughput, and re-conform in the edit process. If we could do everything RAW/unconverted with a native camera codec, that would be the most straightforward, but we seem to be actually going in the opposite direction to that, because we need different data densities at different stages to cope with up- and down-scale platforms, where codecs that are fine in one instance are non-starters in others. Easy to say “4K”, but that’s without doing the math.

    Resolve is one of the most platform-agnostic solutions available at the moment, dealing with most codecs, coughing up all kinds of edit descriptors — XMLs, EDLs, AAFs… Mostly where things go off the rails is when someone decides to get creative and is either ignorant of, or ignores the rules about the interchange and pass-through conventions. Not everything works the way “they” say it does in the brochure, but leaping off a cliff with an umbrella (because, in theory, its not that different from a parachute) is not going to be without its own set of adventures.

    jPo

    “I always pass on free advice — its never of any use to me” Oscar Wilde.

  • Jim Bachalo

    April 17, 2013 at 8:13 pm

    Thanks. If ALL work is being done by just 1 person, what would you recommend as a ‘best practice’ 4k workflow ?

    Local is the new global

  • Nate Weaver

    April 19, 2013 at 2:16 am

    [jim bachalo] “Is this considered a ‘normal’ workflow?”

    I’m not sure if anything is “normal” anymore.

    That said, I see DITs making edit proxies on set using Resolve all the time. Relatively common.

    The other reason DITs do that is any looks created on set can be passed to colorist later.

    Nate Weaver
    Director/D.P., Los Angeles
    https://www.nateweaver.net

  • Javier Sanchez

    April 21, 2013 at 3:08 am

    Have never seen any colorist using dit color…

    Javier Sanchez
    Head Of Technology
    Gama Digital

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy