-
What is fair replacement for broken camera?
Hello everyone,
I have a problem and would like to submit my question to the great COW oracle and get your opinions. I was recently on a shoot for a personal project with a camera that belongs to my employer. During the course of the shoot, I tripped and fell and dropped the camera.When I was hired for the job, I was not offered a salary that I was happy with, but my supervisor said that I could use the employer’s equipment for personal projects as a sort of benefit of the job.
I want to do the right thing here, but I’m not sure what that is and I think I’m being taken.
Here’s the deal. The camera fell lens first. The camera doesn’t look too bad on first glace, but the lens is bent downward maybe 2 degrees and there are stress fractures and cracks around two screws near the lens mount that suggest that the lens pressed inward into the camera. Also, the filter wheel won’t turn. The camera portion seems to work OK and still puts out a picture, but the deck portion acts as if it is not getting power and will not eject the tape.
The product is under an extended warranty, but the warranty doesn’t cover damage, only factory defects. My supervisor says that he talked to someone at Mack over the phone and sent some photographs via e-mail. My supervisor says the person he spoke with at Mack told him that the camera was almost certainly totalled and that based on his experience it would be a waste of money to ship it to them to check out.
Anyway, my employer wants me to pay for the price of a new camera. The one I broke is three years old and was in reasonably good shape as far as I can tell. The new price for a similar camera is $5200 with lens, batteries, charger and power supply. So far, they want me to pay $5200, but I don’t feel too good about that because this one wasn’t new.
A few days before I broke the camera, my supervisor indicated that they planned to buy a camera with more features and sell this one used. Two days after I broke the camera, he bought the camera he had been considering, expecting that I would pay $5200 toward the price. When I look out on the web for this camera used, the price range is $3200-$3900. The $3200 includes lens and viewfinder and the $3900 includes lens, viewfinder, batteries and hard case. I have info on 6 cameras currently listed in this price range in comparable condition and I think that I should not have to pay more than this.
When the new camera arrived, my supervisor decided that he needed the lens because the upgraded camera did not have one. Also, he wants to keep the batteries, charger and power supply.
Tell me what you think. I’m leaning toward this. I pay them aroung $3200 and subtract the value of the lens since they want to keep it. I’d have to look at used lenses, but it would probably make $300-$500 difference. Then I keep the camera and sell it for parts for whatever I can get for it.
What would you do? Does this seem fair? I want to do the right thing here, but I don’t want to be taken advantage of.
And yes, this has been a good learning experience about the value of a rental insurance policy for these things. (Incidentally, we have exhausted all insurance options and none will pay.)
Thanks for your advice!
Michael