Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums VEGAS Pro volleyball footage interlacing problem…

  • volleyball footage interlacing problem…

    Posted by Vincent Croce on January 21, 2008 at 12:56 pm

    Hi all. Did an 8mm analog tape capture of volleyball footage and am creating a highlight dvd for a client to send to interested colleges (Rutgers, for one). The process went smoothly (the uncompressed avi caps look fine), but when I rendered the project to mpg I get what looks like interlacing in any of the shots with camera panning or zooming. Even the rendered avi of the project had the problem. I had just updated to Vegas Pro 8.0b and DVDA 4.5b, had my render settings at Best, Gaussian blur, blend fields, lower field first, and .9091 pixel aspect ratio. I’ve never had this problem before, so I reinstalled version 8.0a and 4.5a, respectively, with no results. The only difference I can see with this project from most of the others I’ve done is the camera the client shot with, a Sony Hi8 Handycam TRV68, and he had a lot of fast camera movement. But I’ve captured plenty of analog footage before, even crappy vhs stuff, and never seen this.
    Any help would be appreciated. Here are two examples, a rendered mpg and avi clip. The avi is 47 mb. Thanks.
    https://firsttakestudios.com/demos/atlanta2007clip1.mpg
    https://firsttakestudios.com/demos/atlanta2007clip1.avi

    Vincent Croce replied 18 years, 3 months ago 4 Members · 9 Replies
  • 9 Replies
  • Vincent Croce

    January 21, 2008 at 2:23 pm

    I just found out that by my slightly zooming in with the track’s pan/crop properties (to get rid of some noise along the edge of the captures) I had caused the interlacing problem. I didn’t know about this and have used the zooming before on other tape to dvd transfers I have done to get rid of tape compression noise along the edges, without noticing any problem. I guess the faster cam movement from this footage made the problem with this technique more obvious. I solved the edge noise problem by a slight black masking of the borders…
    Any ideas why this happens?
    Glad I got a handle on this, it’s due tomorrow…

    Vin Croce
    First Take Studios

  • Mike Kujbida

    January 21, 2008 at 2:36 pm

    Vin, odds are pretty good that, when you zoomed in, you ended up on the wrong video line (odd vs. even or the other way around), thus changing it from lower field to upper field.
    The only solution would be to zoom in or out further by one line.

  • Laszlo Kovacs

    January 21, 2008 at 3:17 pm

    Hi,

    check the “deinterlace method” in the project settings.
    Because you zoom with pan/crop, deinterlacing must be done, and if you set deinterlace method to “none” that’s a fault.
    Another option, that instead of zooming, make a black line over the head switching noise. This will have the advantage, that yoiu don’t need to deinterlace, so preserving motion information.

    Regards

    K.L.

    By(t)e
    Laca

  • Vincent Croce

    January 21, 2008 at 3:48 pm

    Thanks, Laszlo, but as mentioned I did have the correct deinterlacing properties set for the project. I did use a rectangular black mask over the original un-zoomed footage to take care of the problem. And I will test out a one line change in the zooming to see if that takes care of the interlacing, Mike.
    Thanks for the very fast replies!

    Vin Croce
    First Take Studios

  • Douglas Spotted eagle

    January 21, 2008 at 3:56 pm

    If it’s volleyball, you almost certainly want deinterlacing method to be interpolated, not blended.
    Also realize that it may be impossible to completely lose, because you are digitally zooming, thus making the recorded fields larger than they were.

    Douglas Spotted Eagle
    VASST

    Certified Sony Vegas Trainer
    Aerial Camera/Instructor

  • Laszlo Kovacs

    January 21, 2008 at 4:41 pm

    Hi,
    one another idea:
    if you render using “best”, everything is done by vegas
    (deinterlace, bicubic upsizeing etc.)

    When you render it using only “good” deinterlace may not be done, and upsizeing is linear instead of bicubic (if I remember corretly).

    So, if you set up the correct deinterlace method, it may be ignored when not using the “best” quality render.

    Just try it 😉

    DSE is most probably right with the correct deinterlace method.

    Regards

    K.L.

    By(t)e
    Laca

  • Vincent Croce

    January 21, 2008 at 5:09 pm

    Thanks again, Laszlo, but as mentioned in my first post, I had the project rendering set for “best”. The footage looks fine now, even with the ‘blend’ method. I will try out the ‘interpolated’ setting the next time I deinterlace any footage with a lot of side motion. Thanks for the tips Douglas.

    Vin Croce
    First Take Studios

  • Laszlo Kovacs

    January 21, 2008 at 5:52 pm

    [Vincent Croce] “but as mentioned in my first post, I had the project rendering set for “best”.”

    Ooops.
    Sometimes my poor english jokes me, sometimes I don’t read enough carefully.
    🙁

    Sorry for the unnecessary post…

    Regards
    K.L.

  • Vincent Croce

    January 21, 2008 at 6:37 pm

    No apologies necessary, Laszlo. I just appreciate that you took the time to try and help me out. I understood your English quite well…I don’t speak any Hungarian. The closest I ever was to your country was Constanta, Romania, in 1975, when Chowchesku was in power. I thought the Black Sea coast was beautiful.

    Vin Croce
    First Take Studios

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy