Activity › Forums › VEGAS Pro › Vegas Pro 12 slower than Vegas Pro 11 using Sony Vegas benchmark project
-
Vegas Pro 12 slower than Vegas Pro 11 using Sony Vegas benchmark project
Thayalan Paramasawam replied 12 years, 4 months ago 7 Members · 22 Replies
-
Stephen Crye
January 19, 2014 at 3:06 am[Norman Black] “. Otherwise still the same encoder as CPU only. Quality should be pretty similar between CPU and GPU.”
Uh-oh … something new I was unaware of. Norman, are you saying that the CPU-only renders result in a higher quality than the GPU-assisted renders? Because that would bug me, I would be rendering multiple times, playing back, looking for subtle differences.
[Norman Black] “The Mainconcept OpenCL does not support AMD graphics core next GPUs. This means 7xxx series and later. Includes the current R8/R9. I found this out the hard way. My old 5850 flow on MC OpenCL and my new 7950 get no use at al”
Well, the TigerDirect store did not have any AMD HD 6970’s in stock – perhaps a good thing before I shell out nearly $400.00 for a card to replace my nVidia Quadro 2000.
So confused … just tired of waiting forever for renders to finish and not being able to preview at full speed.
My friend’s computer was tied up in a massive 8 hour render for a client project, so we could not do the benchmark. Monday looks better for that.
Still wondering about the various OEM cards for AMD and nVidia. At the store, I see MSI AMD cards, Galaxy and EVGA GeForce cards, etc. Should I be worried about buying a VisionTek AMD 6970?
Steve
Win7 Pro X64 on Dell T7500, MultiTB SATA, 8GB RAM, nVidia Quadro 2000, Vegas 12, 11, 10, 9 DVDA 6.0 & 5.2(build 135) Sony HDR-CX550V, Panasonic GH3 with LUMIX G X VARIO 12-35mm / F2.8 ASPH, LUMIX G X VARIO 35-100mm / F2.8
-
Norman Black
January 19, 2014 at 6:42 amPlayback performance is mostly tied to the CPU, unless you have a bunch of effects that slow things down. In other words, if the media plays fine by itself but cannot play fully with effects and then GPU acceleration can help, otherwise unlikely.
Sadly your CPU is kinda slow at only just over 2Ghz. 3Ghz and up would probably have you a happy camper.
Intel Quicksync would probably be the fastest AVC encoder but sadly your CPU is too old.
-
Stephen Crye
January 19, 2014 at 7:55 am[Norman Black] “Sadly your CPU is kinda slow at only just over 2Ghz. 3Ghz and up would probably have you a happy camper.”
True that, but I’m stuck with this box for at least the next year.
I can live with slow playback, but would like to speed up renders.
I can add a second CPU – thoughts on that? That would give me 8 physical cores, and Vegas by default can run 16 threads.
Steve
Win7 Pro X64 on Dell T7500, MultiTB SATA, 8GB RAM, nVidia Quadro 2000, Vegas 12, 11, 10, 9 DVDA 6.0 & 5.2(build 135) Sony HDR-CX550V, Panasonic GH3 with LUMIX G X VARIO 12-35mm / F2.8 ASPH, LUMIX G X VARIO 35-100mm / F2.8
-
Dave Haynie
January 20, 2014 at 3:28 pm[Norman Black] “The Mainconcept AVC OpenCL does not support AMD graphics core next GPUs. This means 7xxx series and later. Includes the current R8/R9. I found this out the hard way. My old 5850 flew on MC OpenCL and my new 7950 gets no use at all. Vegas itself and Sony AVC are fine with current AMD cards.”
I didn’t realize that… looked up a little information about it. They basically pulled a “Adobe Premiere” here. They have a list of supported cards (or perhaps GPUs, like Juniper, Cayman… nothing beyond the HD6xxx series) hard-coded into the Main Concept driver. If you don’t have that device, you don’t get to use OpenCL. STUPID! Worst move I can imagine… the whole point of OpenCL is that the “compute device” doesn’t matter.
Now it makes sense why nVidia isn’t supported at all by the Main Concept driver, even though nVidia’s OpenCL sound work fine with it (if, perhaps, not as fast as CUDA, particularly on a Kepler chip).
-Dave
-
Stephen Crye
January 21, 2014 at 3:45 amHi;
Just got back from Ozzie’s house.
Here’s the summary: using SVP12.770 on his AMD FX-8350 8-core 4113.7 MHz system on a SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 mombo with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Revision A2 GK104 Kepler GPU, render times are nearly identical with CPU-only, OpenCL or CUDA. I did not get screen grabs of the CPU and GPU graphs, but the only codec that pushed the GPU at all was Sony AVC, and even then it barely pushed 30%.
Preview performance of the Red Car project was great – consistent 29.97 through about 99% of the project, with preview set to Best, Full.
Render times for the “red car” project:
MainConcept AVC CUDA = 2:56 , OpenCL = 2:57 , CPU-only 2:56
Sony AVC 2:46 regardless of CPU/GPU selection, which was strange because when the GPU was selected the GPU graphs went higher than other tests, and the CPU graphs dropped.His CPU-Z report is at the bottom of this post – would have loved to include it as a link, but Cow does not support .txt.
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is in the CUDA 3.0 group. No matter how much I search, I can’t find any definitive statement from Sony about CUDU 3.0 support, regardless of the NVIDIA driver version.
Our results seem to show that there is NO support in build 770 for CUDA 3.0 cards. But, because his CPU-only times are still about 15% faster than my GPU accelerated times, if he did get a card that supported GPU acceleration, his system would probably fly.
Comments welcome, because I am still agonizing over what card to get for my system – should I stick with a fast Fermi, go AMD, or get Kepler in anticipation of future support?
arrrgh.
https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/kepler-tuning-guide/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CUDA#Supported_GPUs
Steve
———- CPU-Z for Ozzie ———–
CPU-Z TXT Report
————————————————————————-Binaries
————————————————————————-CPU-Z version 1.68.0.×64
Processors
————————————————————————-Number of processors 1
Number of threads 8APICs
————————————————————————-Processor 0
— Core 0
— Thread 0 0
— Core 1
— Thread 0 1
— Core 2
— Thread 0 2
— Core 3
— Thread 0 3
— Core 4
— Thread 0 4
— Core 5
— Thread 0 5
— Core 6
— Thread 0 6
— Core 7
— Thread 0 7Timers
————————————————————————-ACPI timer 3.580 MHz
HPET timer 14.318 MHz
Perf timer 3.920 MHz
Sys timer 1.000 KHz
BCLK timer 1605.43 MHzProcessors Information
————————————————————————-Processor 1 ID = 0
Number of cores 8 (max 8)
Number of threads 8 (max 8)
Name AMD FX-8350
Codename Vishera
Specification AMD FX(tm)-8350 Eight-Core Processor
Package Socket AM3+ (942)
CPUID F.2.0
Extended CPUID 15.2
Core Stepping OR-C0
Technology 32 nm
TDP Limit 125 Watts
Core Speed 4113.7 MHz
Multiplier x Bus Speed 20.5 x 200.7 MHz
Rated Bus speed 2608.7 MHz
Stock frequency 4000 MHz
Instructions sets MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, XOP, FMA3, FMA4
L1 Data cache 8 x 16 KBytes, 4-way set associative, 64-byte line size
L1 Instruction cache 4 x 64 KBytes, 2-way set associative, 64-byte line size
L2 cache 4 x 2048 KBytes, 16-way set associative, 64-byte line size
L3 cache 8 MBytes, 64-way set associative, 64-byte line size
FID/VID Control yes
Min FID 7.0x
# of P-States 7
P-State FID 0x1A – VID 0x0A – IDD 13 (21.00x – 1.425 V)
P-State FID 0x19 – VID 0x0B – IDD 13 (20.50x – 1.412 V)
P-State FID 0x18 – VID 0x10 – IDD 12 (20.00x – 1.350 V)
P-State FID 0x12 – VID 0x18 – IDD 10 (17.00x – 1.250 V)
P-State FID 0xC – VID 0x20 – IDD 8 (14.00x – 1.150 V)
P-State FID 0x5 – VID 0x2A – IDD 5 (10.50x – 1.025 V)
P-State FID 0x10C – VID 0x34 – IDD 4 (7.00x – 0.900 V)PStateReg 0x80000186-0x0000141A
PStateReg 0x80000186-0x00001619
PStateReg 0x80000177-0x00002018
PStateReg 0x8000015F-0x00003012
PStateReg 0x8000014B-0x0000400C
PStateReg 0x80000136-0x00005405
PStateReg 0x80000124-0x0000684C
PStateReg 0x00000000-0x00000000Package Type 0x1
Model 00
String 1 0x0
String 2 0x0
Page 0x0
Base TDP 6 Watts
Boosted P-States 2
Max non-turbo ratio 20.00x
Max turbo ratio 21.00x
TSC 4014.0 MHz
APERF 4115.9 MHz
MPERF 4013.6 MHzChipset
————————————————————————-Northbridge AMD RD9x0 rev. 02
Southbridge AMD SB950 rev. 40
Graphic Interface PCI-Express
PCI-E Link Width x16
PCI-E Max Link Width x16
Memory Type DDR3
Memory Size 16 GBytes
Channels Dual
Memory Frequency 802.7 MHz (1:4)
CAS# latency (CL) 9.0
RAS# to CAS# delay (tRCD) 9
RAS# Precharge (tRP) 9
Cycle Time (tRAS) 24
Bank Cycle Time (tRC) 39
Uncore Frequency 2207.4 MHzMemory SPD
————————————————————————-DIMM # 1
SMBus address 0x52
Memory type DDR3
Module format UDIMM
Manufacturer (ID) Crucial Technology (7F7F7F7F7F9B0000)
Size 8192 MBytes
Max bandwidth PC3-12800H (800 MHz)
Part number BLS8G3D1609DS1S00.
Serial number A3118DF7
Number of banks 8
Nominal Voltage 1.50 Volts
EPP no
XMP yes
XMP revision 1.3
AMP no
JEDEC timings table CL-tRCD-tRP-tRAS-tRC @ frequency
JEDEC #1 5.0-5-5-14-22 @ 444 MHz
JEDEC #2 6.0-6-6-16-26 @ 533 MHz
JEDEC #3 7.0-7-7-19-31 @ 622 MHz
JEDEC #4 8.0-8-8-22-35 @ 711 MHz
JEDEC #5 9.0-9-9-24-39 @ 800 MHz
JEDEC #6 10.0-10-10-27-44 @ 888 MHz
JEDEC #7 11.0-11-11-30-48 @ 977 MHz
XMP profile XMP-1600
Specification PC3-12800H
Voltage level 1.500 Volts
Min Cycle time 1.250 ns (800 MHz)
Max CL 9.0
Min tRP 11.25 ns
Min tRCD 11.25 ns
Min tWR 15.00 ns
Min tRAS 30.00 ns
Min tRC 46.25 ns
Min tRFC 300.00 ns
Min tRTP 7.50 ns
Min tRRD 6.00 ns
Command Rate 2T
XMP timings table CL-tRCD-tRP-tRAS-tRC-CR @ frequency (voltage)
XMP #1 5.0-5-5-14-21-2T @ 444 MHz (1.500 Volts)
XMP #2 6.0-6-6-16-25-2T @ 533 MHz (1.500 Volts)
XMP #3 7.0-7-7-19-29-2T @ 622 MHz (1.500 Volts)
XMP #4 8.0-8-8-22-33-2T @ 711 MHz (1.500 Volts)
XMP #5 9.0-9-9-24-37-2T @ 800 MHz (1.500 Volts)
XMP #6 10.0-10-10-27-42-2T @ 888 MHz (1.500 Volts)
XMP #7 11.0-11-11-30-46-2T @ 977 MHz (1.500 Volts)DIMM # 2
SMBus address 0x53
Memory type DDR3
Module format UDIMM
Manufacturer (ID) Crucial Technology (7F7F7F7F7F9B0000)
Size 8192 MBytes
Max bandwidth PC3-12800H (800 MHz)
Part number BLS8G3D1609DS1S00.
Serial number A5047EE9
Number of banks 8
Nominal Voltage 1.50 Volts
EPP no
XMP yes
XMP revision 1.3
AMP no
JEDEC timings table CL-tRCD-tRP-tRAS-tRC @ frequency
JEDEC #1 5.0-5-5-14-22 @ 444 MHz
JEDEC #2 6.0-6-6-16-26 @ 533 MHz
JEDEC #3 7.0-7-7-19-31 @ 622 MHz
JEDEC #4 8.0-8-8-22-35 @ 711 MHz
JEDEC #5 9.0-9-9-24-39 @ 800 MHz
JEDEC #6 10.0-10-10-27-44 @ 888 MHz
JEDEC #7 11.0-11-11-30-48 @ 977 MHz
XMP profile XMP-1600
Specification PC3-12800H
Voltage level 1.500 Volts
Min Cycle time 1.250 ns (800 MHz)
Max CL 9.0
Min tRP 11.25 ns
Min tRCD 11.25 ns
Min tWR 15.00 ns
Min tRAS 30.00 ns
Min tRC 46.25 ns
Min tRFC 300.00 ns
Min tRTP 7.50 ns
Min tRRD 6.00 ns
Command Rate 2T
XMP timings table CL-tRCD-tRP-tRAS-tRC-CR @ frequency (voltage)
XMP #1 5.0-5-5-14-21-2T @ 444 MHz (1.500 Volts)
XMP #2 6.0-6-6-16-25-2T @ 533 MHz (1.500 Volts)
XMP #3 7.0-7-7-19-29-2T @ 622 MHz (1.500 Volts)
XMP #4 8.0-8-8-22-33-2T @ 711 MHz (1.500 Volts)
XMP #5 9.0-9-9-24-37-2T @ 800 MHz (1.500 Volts)
XMP #6 10.0-10-10-27-42-2T @ 888 MHz (1.500 Volts)
XMP #7 11.0-11-11-30-46-2T @ 977 MHz (1.500 Volts)Monitoring
————————————————————————-Mainboard Model SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (0x0000055D – 0x1EDE55C0)
DMI
————————————————————————-DMI BIOS
vendor American Megatrends Inc.
version 1503
date 01/11/2013
ROM size 8192 KBDMI System Information
manufacturer To be filled by O.E.M.
product To be filled by O.E.M.
version To be filled by O.E.M.
serial To be filled by O.E.M.
UUID {7EDDB7C0-B83F-11DC-91ED-60A44C6131BC}
SKU SKU
family To be filled by O.E.M.DMI Baseboard
vendor ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
model SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0
revision Rev 1.xx
serial 130208207901010DMI System Enclosure
manufacturer To Be Filled By O.E.M.
chassis type Desktop
chassis serial To Be Filled By O.E.M.DMI Processor
manufacturer AMD
model AMD FX(tm)-8350 Eight-Core Processor
clock speed 4000.0 MHz
FSB speed 200.0 MHz
multiplier 20.0xGraphics
————————————————————————-Number of adapters 1
Graphic APIs
————————————————————————-API NVIDIA I/O
API NVIDIA NVAPIDisplay Adapters
————————————————————————-Display adapter 0
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Revision A2
Codename GK104
Technology 28 nm
Memory size 3071 MB
PCI device bus 1 (0x1), device 0 (0x0), function 0 (0x0)
Vendor ID 0x10DE (0x3842)
Model ID 0x1183 (0x3663)
Performance Level 0
Core clock 324.0 MHz
Memory clock 324.0 MHzWin32_VideoController AdapterRAM = 0xBFFB0000 (3220897792)
Win32_VideoController DriverVersion = 9.18.13.1407
Win32_VideoController DriverDate = 02/09/2013Win7 Pro X64 on Dell T7500, MultiTB SATA, 8GB RAM, nVidia Quadro 2000, Vegas 12, 11, 10, 9 DVDA 6.0 & 5.2(build 135) Sony HDR-CX550V, Panasonic GH3 with LUMIX G X VARIO 12-35mm / F2.8 ASPH, LUMIX G X VARIO 35-100mm / F2.8
-
Thayalan Paramasawam
January 22, 2014 at 12:30 amMorning Sir,
(Stephen Crye)Comments welcome, because I am still agonizing over what card to get for my system – should I stick with a fast Fermi, go AMD, or get Kepler in anticipation of future support?
Me too sir……waiting for best result and comments from members
-
Stephen Crye
January 27, 2014 at 5:04 amThayalan, what card do you have now?
You might want to update your Cow “signature” to include info about your system and cameras.
Steve
Win7 Pro X64 on Dell T7500, MultiTB SATA, 8GB RAM, nVidia Quadro 2000, Vegas 12, 11, 10, 9 DVDA 6.0 & 5.2(build 135) Sony HDR-CX550V, Panasonic GH3 with LUMIX G X VARIO 12-35mm / F2.8 ASPH, LUMIX G X VARIO 35-100mm / F2.8
-
Thayalan Paramasawam
January 27, 2014 at 9:13 amHi Sir,
(Stephen Crye)Thayalan, what card do you have now?
I have 3 Working Station.
System Details:
Custom Built
Working Station 1) – Motherboard – Asus M4A78 Plus,Processor – Amd Phenom llx4 945 Black Edition,Ram – 4GB,Graphic Card – Ati Radeon HD 5990,Dvd Writer – Plextor PX-890SA,Operating system – Window 7 Pro 32 bit and Editing Programe -Sony Vegas Pro 10Working Station 2) – Motherboard – Asus M4A88T-V-EVO Series,Processor – Amd Phenom llx4 955 3.2GHZ Black Edition,Ram – 16 GB,Graphic Card – Asus HD 6770 1GB DDR 5,Blu Ray Writer – Plextor PX-B950SA,Operating System – Window 7 64 Pro Bit and Editing Programe – Sony Vegas Pro 11
Working Station 3) – Motherboard – Asus M5A99X-EVO,Processor – Amd FX 8350 4.0/4.2 GHZ,Ram – 16 GB,Graphic Card – Asus Gtx 650 1GB DDR 5,Blu Ray Writer – Plextor PX-B950SA,Operating System – Window 7 Pro 64 Bit and Editing Programe – Sony Vegas Pro 12
-
Stephen Crye
January 28, 2014 at 3:49 amHeh … Now I know why your signature does not have your specs! It would make it too long.
System 3 seems pretty fast. It has the GTX 650, which is Kepler I think – have you tried pulling the old Asus HD 6770 out and trying it? I’d be curious to see if it speeds up renders. But I know that it would be a pain to do that, might break something.
Steve
Win7 Pro X64 on Dell T7500, MultiTB SATA, 8GB RAM, nVidia Quadro 2000, Vegas 12, 11, 10, 9 DVDA 6.0 & 5.2(build 135) Sony HDR-CX550V, Panasonic GH3 with LUMIX G X VARIO 12-35mm / F2.8 ASPH, LUMIX G X VARIO 35-100mm / F2.8
-
Thayalan Paramasawam
January 28, 2014 at 5:41 amHi Sir,
(Stephen Crye)System 3 seems pretty fast. It has the GTX 650, which is Kepler I think.
But i am still having probleum when rendering,its crash or stop rendering when reach to 50%.So i off the GPU ACCELERATION.Any Solution for this probleum.Or need to change graphic Card?
Same probleum also for second AMD HD 6770…..
Thank You
Thayalan ParamasawamSystem Details:
Custom Built
Working Station 1) – Motherboard – Asus M4A78 Plus,Processor – Amd Phenom llx4 945 Black Edition,Ram – 4GB,Graphic Card – Ati Radeon HD 5990,Dvd Writer – Plextor PX-890SA,Operating system – Window 7 Pro 32 bit and Editing Programe -Sony Vegas Pro 10Working Station 2) – Motherboard – Asus M4A88T-V-EVO Series,Processor – Amd Phenom llx4 955 3.2GHZ Black Edition,Ram – 16 GB,Graphic Card – Asus HD 6770 1GB DDR 5,Blu Ray Writer – Plextor PX-B950SA,Operating System – Window 7 Pro 64 Bit and Editing Programe – Sony Vegas Pro 11
Working Station 3) – Motherboard – Asus M5A99X-EVO,Processor – Amd FX 8350 4.0/4.2 GHZ,Ram – 16 GB,Graphic Card – Asus Gtx 650 1GB DDR 5,Blu Ray Writer – Plextor PX-B950SA,Operating System – Window 7 Pro 64 Bit and Editing Programe – Sony Vegas Pro 12
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up