-
Roger Bansemer
January 13, 2014 at 12:23 pmVegas is installed on my C: drive.
I edit my projects on a SATA drive and render them to the same SATA drive. Would it be better to render them to a different drive altogether or are we just talking about not having Vegas and the program on the same drive?Roger Bansemer – PaintingAndTravel.com
-
Stephen Crye
January 14, 2014 at 5:35 amHey Roger;
With bare drives so cheap, and those external bays that let you hot swap them also cheap, you might as well try it. $50 for a TB SATA III last week at TigerDirect …
If you have a fast system (CPU, CPU, bus, etc. ), you might not notice the difference.
I’m kind of a purist in wanting separate drives for the .veg, temp and render target. Have not done any benchmarks in a while …
Steve
Win7 Pro X64 on Dell T7500, MultiTB SATA, 8GB RAM, nVidia Quadro 2000, Vegas 12, 11, 10, 9 DVDA 6.0 & 5.2(build 135) Sony HDR-CX550V, Panasonic GH3 with LUMIX G X VARIO 12-35mm / F2.8 ASPH, LUMIX G X VARIO 35-100mm / F2.8
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up