-
Rick Altizer
September 22, 2012 at 3:21 amWow, that is a big difference. Thanks so much for your response.
So do I have to get a $700 graphics card like yours?
It would be great if I could find out what cards actually work. -
John Rofrano
September 22, 2012 at 10:50 am[Rick Altizer] “So do I have to get a $700 graphics card like yours?”
If you’re not doing this professionally, that’s a lot of money to spend on a graphics card. I guess the solution would be to find out who is using what GeForce card and which ones seem to work. Maybe start a thread called: “Survey of GPU’s for Vegas Pro 11.0” (that should get peoples attention) and have people post what they are using and if it’s working or are they having trouble. If you see a lot of people with the same card having success, then that’s the card I would get. 😉
~jr
http://www.johnrofrano.com
http://www.vasst.com -
Brad Miller
March 4, 2013 at 10:02 pmI get the same error with Vegas 12.
Problem: Unmanaged Exception (0xc0000005)
Fault Module: C:Windowssystem32nvopencl.dllI bought the GTX 560 because Sony said it was compatible. Saying to ask for Sony tech support is a joke because they never respond or they say to reformat your computer and try again.
-
Al Bergstein
March 5, 2013 at 12:14 amBrad, what are you trying to render? I have the 570 also. I found that it Vegas 11 was unstable when using multimonitors, or working with NewBlueFX in the same timeline as the video clips. How I stabilized it was to simply only ever use one monitor, and to do all FX editing I could on a new timeline, render it and then add the rendered footage back in. I work in primarily mxf footage off a Canon and also do some work with MOV using Canon HDSLR work.
Oddly, my work (I have been reworking some older projects) has been extremely stable since I started doing that. Depressing in that it severely limits the usefullness of Vegas “Pro”.
Specifics:
[Display]
Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate, 64-bit (Service Pack 1)
DirectX version: 11.0
GPU processor: GeForce GTX 570
Driver version: 306.97
DirectX support: 11.1
CUDA Cores: 480
Core clock: 732 MHz
Shader clock: 1464 MHz
Memory data rate: 3800 MHz
Memory interface: 320-bit
Total available graphics memory: 4096 MB
Dedicated video memory: 1280 MB GDDR5
System video memory: 0 MB
Shared system memory: 2816 MB
Video BIOS version: 70.10.49.00.78
IRQ: 16
Bus: PCI Express x16 Gen2[Components]
easyDaemonAPIU64.DLL 1.10.8.0 NVIDIA Update Components
WLMerger.exe 1.10.8.0 NVIDIA Update Components
daemonu.exe 1.10.8.0 NVIDIA Update Components
ComUpdatus.exe 1.10.8.0 NVIDIA Update Components
NvUpdtr.dll 1.10.8.0 NVIDIA Update Components
NvUpdt.dll 1.10.8.0 NVIDIA Update Components
nvui.dll 8.17.13.0697 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component
nvxdsync.exe 8.17.13.0697 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component
nvxdplcy.dll 8.17.13.0697 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component
nvxdbat.dll 8.17.13.0697 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component
nvxdapix.dll 8.17.13.0697 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component
NVCPL.DLL 8.17.13.0697 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component
nvCplUIR.dll 4.8.750.0 NVIDIA Control Panel
nvCplUI.exe 4.8.750.0 NVIDIA Control Panel
nvWSSR.dll 6.14.13.0697 NVIDIA Workstation Server
nvWSS.dll 6.14.13.0697 NVIDIA Workstation Server
nvViTvSR.dll 6.14.13.0697 NVIDIA Video Server
nvViTvS.dll 6.14.13.0697 NVIDIA Video Server
NVSTVIEW.EXE 7.17.13.0697 NVIDIA 3D Vision Photo Viewer
NVSTTEST.EXE 7.17.13.0697 NVIDIA 3D Vision Test Application
NVSTRES.DLL 7.17.13.0697 NVIDIA 3D Vision Module (0)
nvDispSR.dll 6.14.13.0697 NVIDIA Display Server
NVMCTRAY.DLL 8.17.13.0697 NVIDIA Media Center Library
nvDispS.dll 6.14.13.0697 NVIDIA Display Server
NVCUDA.DLL 8.17.13.0697 NVIDIA CUDA 5.0.1 driver
nvGameSR.dll 6.14.13.0697 NVIDIA 3D Settings Server
nvGameS.dll 6.14.13.0697 NVIDIA 3D Settings ServerAl
-
John Rofrano
March 5, 2013 at 11:39 am[Brad Miller] “I get the same error with Vegas 12.
Problem: Unmanaged Exception (0xc0000005)
Fault Module: C:Windowssystem32nvopencl.dll”Probably because the problem is with your video driver and not Vegas Pro.
[Brad Miller] “I bought the GTX 560 because Sony said it was compatible.”
Have you tried updating your video drivers? The first thing I would do is update to the latest drivers on the NVIDIA site. If that doesn’t fix it, then install the latest driver from your card manufacturer because those are the drivers that they actually tested with regardless of how old they are. It may be that you just need a different version of the drivers.
The odd thing is that with an NVIDIA card, Vegas Pro should not be using OpenCL, it should be using CUDA. It’s really odd that the OpenCL driver is causing the issue. I think you just need to find the driver version that other GTX 560 owners are using successfully and stick with that.
~jr
http://www.johnrofrano.com
http://www.vasst.com -
Jeff Vondungen
February 24, 2014 at 3:23 amI strongly think the problem is the voltage settings on your PC. Noticed this when overclocking my EVGA X58 with a GTX560. I can see where the system will just stop responding/rendering and the GPU drops to zero.
Once I figured out the correct settings she blazes %100 full GPU renders. Chances are you are overheating. Might be one of your bridges that may not give you temp readings.
Good luck! ~J -
Tobias Von brockdorff
November 23, 2016 at 1:42 amHi John,
I’m working here for years with all Vegas Versions …
Working on very compelex projects today with a dual xeon 8 Core … 64 GB PC.I always would’nt spent so much mony for a Quadro card
but I’m still not happy with my realtime Performance (Video Preview) of Vegas.I have two NVidia GeForce GTX 780 wich works great wit Adobe Premiere, I tested …
… but I’m not a Premiere Man!Now I think about to invest in a PNY Quadro M …
But I’m not shure, if there will be any realtime performance increase with Vegas 14.
What about your thoughts and experience.
I read you got an Quadro 4000, maybe years ago.
Will there be a performance increase with a Quadro M4000
and is there another increase expected with an M5000 ??My questions are only about preview realtime performance, not about rendering, I can wait ?
… but I hate if Vegas stuggle when I make a simple blend/disolve/wipe in or out,
or if I work with more then two tracks Full HD.Will it be possible to playback QHD in realtime with any Quadro without prerendering RAM-preview?
Best regards
Tobi
P.S. Thank you John for answering every Question here since years.
-
John Rofrano
November 23, 2016 at 3:52 pm[Tobias von Brockdorff] “Now I think about to invest in a PNY Quadro M … But I’m not shure, if there will be any realtime performance increase with Vegas 14.”
Hi Tobi,
I don’t use Vegas Pro anymore and have no real experience with 14. I moved to the Mac and use Final Cut Pro X and it takes complete advantage of every ounce of power my Mac Pro’s GPU can deliver. I don’t worry about hardware and software incompatibilities anymore because Apple makes both my hardware and software. So I really don’t have any advice (other than buy a Mac and use FCP X) to help with your hardware dilemma.
My understanding from what I’ve read is that Vegas Pro 14 hasn’t done anything to improve GPU support and, in fact, doesn’t support CUDA with newer NVIDIA cards so a newer Quadro will probably perform worse than my Quadro 4000 did which was supported back in 2012.
If you want to get good GPU performance from Vegas Pro you should invest in an AMD GPU, not NVIDIA!
~jr
http://www.johnrofrano.com
http://www.vasstsoftware.com -
Ole Kristiansen
November 23, 2016 at 4:24 pmRemember Amd graphics card uses a lot more power than a Nvidia graphics card.
I got a EVGA SuperNOVA 1300W PSU, for my 2 Sapphire NITRO Radeon R9 390X – 8 GB GDDR5 graphics cards ! -
Stephen Crye
November 25, 2016 at 2:10 amJohn, how long did it take to get used to the Final Cut workflow? I’ve looked at it, and it is very, very different.
If I do move to Mac – I’m thinking of it – how well does Vegas 12 run on it?
Thanks,
Steve
Win7 Pro X64 on Dell T7500, MultiTB SATA, 12GB RAM, nVidia Quadro 2000, Vegas 12, 11, 10, 9 DVDA 6.0 & 5.2(build 135) Sony HDR-CX550V, Panasonic GH3 with LUMIX G X VARIO 12-35mm / F2.8 ASPH, LUMIX G X VARIO 35-100mm / F2.8
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up