-
Using High Resolution stills in a Standard definition film
Posted by Jane Wielecki on February 23, 2014 at 3:03 amHi all,
I am working on Standard Def 720 x 576 footage (PAL 25fps) from 2005 using Sony Vegas Pro 10.I want to use some still images in the film which are a higher resolution.
Do I need to reduce the stills down to 720 x 576 or can they be larger in size? What size is recommended as maximum for the stills?
If I keep the stills larger, will this cause any lag once the film is rendered?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, JaneThomas Roberts replied 12 years, 2 months ago 6 Members · 13 Replies -
13 Replies
-
Steve Rhoden
February 23, 2014 at 3:35 amIts always best to reduce still images to almost the resolution
of your project Jane!Steve Rhoden
(Cow Leader)
Film Editor & Compositor.
Filmex Creative Media.
https://www.facebook.com/FilmexCreativeMedia
1-876-461-9019 -
Steve Rhoden
February 23, 2014 at 11:25 amSure!
Steve Rhoden
(Cow Leader)
Film Editor & Compositor.
Filmex Creative Media.
https://www.facebook.com/FilmexCreativeMedia
1-876-461-9019 -
Graham Bernard
February 23, 2014 at 2:56 pm_______________________________________________________________
[Jane Wielecki] “If I keep the stills larger, will this cause any lag once the film is rendered?”
_______________________________________________________________No. Once the project is rendered, and therefore what ever resolution you’ve set the render to, that’s it, end-of! However, you may notice what is called “tweening” of fine detail, which might be killed off if you reduce your reso to start with. But Lag, here you’re meaning audio lag, no.
Grazie
Video Content Creator and Potter
PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge -
John Bolton
February 23, 2014 at 3:50 pmIf you intend to do any panning or zooming IN on the stills, then resize then to max of twice the project size setting. Like Graham mentions, if the pictures are a very much larger size than the project settings then you get a sort of shimmering effect on fine details……. John
-
Thomas Roberts
February 23, 2014 at 4:19 pmLarry Jordan has a really good video on using still frames for FCPx. I found this video to be very helpful in Vegas.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oINcdTV1lY
T
Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.
-
Graham Bernard
February 23, 2014 at 4:39 pmTom – perfect explanations. More than that, the reasoning and motives WHY!
Thanks
Grazie
Video Content Creator and Potter
PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge -
Bob Peterson
February 23, 2014 at 10:59 pmAs others have said, or implied, the stills will be reduced to the size that which the output format supports. That is part of what the rendering process does. So, the question is not whether the high resolution will be lost in rendering, it is what software will be used to perform the reduction. My bias is to ALWAYS use the software which is built specifically to accomplish a given task. For stills, my view is that the conversion to a new resolution is ALWAYS done best by software which is designed to do that job. I don’t believe that software which is designed to render video is best when the job is to reduce the resolution of a still photo. That job should be done by a still photo editor.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up