Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums VEGAS Pro Using High Resolution stills in a Standard definition film

  • Using High Resolution stills in a Standard definition film

    Posted by Jane Wielecki on February 23, 2014 at 3:03 am

    Hi all,
    I am working on Standard Def 720 x 576 footage (PAL 25fps) from 2005 using Sony Vegas Pro 10.

    I want to use some still images in the film which are a higher resolution.

    Do I need to reduce the stills down to 720 x 576 or can they be larger in size? What size is recommended as maximum for the stills?

    If I keep the stills larger, will this cause any lag once the film is rendered?

    Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks, Jane

    Thomas Roberts replied 12 years, 2 months ago 6 Members · 13 Replies
  • 13 Replies
  • Steve Rhoden

    February 23, 2014 at 3:35 am

    Its always best to reduce still images to almost the resolution
    of your project Jane!

    Steve Rhoden
    (Cow Leader)
    Film Editor & Compositor.
    Filmex Creative Media.
    https://www.facebook.com/FilmexCreativeMedia
    1-876-461-9019

  • Jane Wielecki

    February 23, 2014 at 9:06 am

    Thank you Steve.

  • Steve Rhoden

    February 23, 2014 at 11:25 am

    Sure!

    Steve Rhoden
    (Cow Leader)
    Film Editor & Compositor.
    Filmex Creative Media.
    https://www.facebook.com/FilmexCreativeMedia
    1-876-461-9019

  • Graham Bernard

    February 23, 2014 at 2:56 pm

    _______________________________________________________________

    [Jane Wielecki] “If I keep the stills larger, will this cause any lag once the film is rendered?”
    _______________________________________________________________

    No. Once the project is rendered, and therefore what ever resolution you’ve set the render to, that’s it, end-of! However, you may notice what is called “tweening” of fine detail, which might be killed off if you reduce your reso to start with. But Lag, here you’re meaning audio lag, no.

    Grazie

    Video Content Creator and Potter
    PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
    Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge

  • John Bolton

    February 23, 2014 at 3:50 pm

    If you intend to do any panning or zooming IN on the stills, then resize then to max of twice the project size setting. Like Graham mentions, if the pictures are a very much larger size than the project settings then you get a sort of shimmering effect on fine details……. John

  • Thomas Roberts

    February 23, 2014 at 4:19 pm

    Larry Jordan has a really good video on using still frames for FCPx. I found this video to be very helpful in Vegas.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oINcdTV1lY

    T

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  • Graham Bernard

    February 23, 2014 at 4:39 pm

    Tom – perfect explanations. More than that, the reasoning and motives WHY!

    Thanks

    Grazie

    Video Content Creator and Potter
    PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
    Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge

  • Bob Peterson

    February 23, 2014 at 10:59 pm

    As others have said, or implied, the stills will be reduced to the size that which the output format supports. That is part of what the rendering process does. So, the question is not whether the high resolution will be lost in rendering, it is what software will be used to perform the reduction. My bias is to ALWAYS use the software which is built specifically to accomplish a given task. For stills, my view is that the conversion to a new resolution is ALWAYS done best by software which is designed to do that job. I don’t believe that software which is designed to render video is best when the job is to reduce the resolution of a still photo. That job should be done by a still photo editor.

  • Jane Wielecki

    February 24, 2014 at 12:29 am

    Thank you Thomas. This is a great link.
    Regards, Jane

  • Jane Wielecki

    February 24, 2014 at 12:36 am

    Thanks Graham.

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy