Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › Upgradable GPUs
-
Upgradable GPUs
Posted by Andrew Richards on June 11, 2013 at 4:01 amInformal poll, raise your hand if you have upgraded the factory GPU in your 2008-or-newer Mac Pro to one of these current-gen GPUs:
EVGA GeForce GTX 680 for Mac
SAPPHIRE HD 7950 3GB GDDR5 MAC Edition
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 GPU for MacI’m just wondering if the chorus lamenting the apparently hard-soldered dual GPUs on the new Mac Pro are taking full advantage of their current user-servicable GPU upgrade options.
Best,
AndyMichael Gissing replied 12 years, 11 months ago 13 Members · 22 Replies -
22 Replies
-
Andrew Kimery
June 11, 2013 at 4:03 amWhat no love for the people that have upgraded their 1,1 Mac Pros?
-
Michael Gissing
June 11, 2013 at 4:05 amI’ll put my hand up. I did upgrade, change Mobo, RAM, system drive and add a GTX680. But I did it rebuilding a PC. My MacPro is locked in Sl Legacy land and with Color, I can’t go NVIDIA and get any advantage. The RAM is already more than Legacy can handle.
Over the years I have upgraded GPU and RAM and system drives in my MacPros. This time I just jumped ship.
-
Andrew Richards
June 11, 2013 at 4:08 am[Andrew Kimery] “What no love for the people that have upgraded their 1,1 Mac Pros?”
None of the modern cards I linked work in a 1,1. Hence the distinction. If you upgraded your 1,1 what did you go from and what do you use now?
Best,
Andy -
Andrew Richards
June 11, 2013 at 4:11 am[Michael Gissing] “Over the years I have upgraded GPU and RAM and system drives in my MacPros. This time I just jumped ship.”
Kind of my point. My hunch is not very many Mac Pro owners took advantage of their slotted GPU’s upgradability, even if there only ever were a small handful of upgrade options out there.
Best,
Andy -
Michael Gissing
June 11, 2013 at 4:28 amGiven the FCP/Color Preference for ATI cards, there was little to gain unless running Adobe or other software. I think the number who jumped ship to PCs because of that is significant, rather than few people update their MacPro.
To argue that a MacPro was rarely updated to NVIDIA cards is hardly proof that internal upgradable GPU is a non stater.
-
Andrew Richards
June 11, 2013 at 4:32 am[Michael Gissing] “To argue that a MacPro was rarely updated to NVIDIA cards is hardly proof that internal upgradable GPU is a non stater.”
Or newer Radeon cards, like the Sapphire card I linked to. If someone is not a Mac user, the new Mac Pro is hardly relevant regardless of its hardware.
Best,
Andy -
Michael Gissing
June 11, 2013 at 4:39 amThis new MacPro does seem to have enough GPU for most users so I am not arguing that lack of modding is really an issue for most. Apple have certainly solved the GPU deficiency for most users.
Only some want to tinker under the hood and we can play happily in PC land unless we need Mac OS specific software which is the only reason why I bought a G5 all those years ago.
It is a bit like grandads favourite axe but I am using rack mount cases from 15 years ago. Bang for bucks and keeping up to date is why I prefer to tinker so for both those reasons, I am not particularly excited by this announcement but I do understand why many are.
-
Jamal Watts
June 11, 2013 at 5:31 amI upgraded my 3,1’s (2008) GPU but not to one of the cards that you listed. I upgraded the ATI 2600 to an nVidia GTX 470. I keep both in the box. I used to GTX as my main card and use the ATI as a GUI when I’m in Resolve. Only drawback is that I have no grey boot screen. Not really a drawback for me, really.
-
Michael Garber
June 11, 2013 at 5:56 amI upgraded 3 of my Mac Pros to 5770s and 5880s when those were the only options available. One of the systems was a 2008. The other 2 were 2007s.
I sold all three when I consolidated my office and decided to purchased an iMac late last year. I have already started to notice sluggishness on the iMac on certain FCPX projects, so I figure in a year the current system will be ready for Craigslist.
Historically, I prefer upgrading parts vs short-term resale (mainly because that’s been my pattern). Ultimately it comes down to cost. If the resale value works out more in my favor to sell early and purchase new in a shorter time frame, then so be it.
Michael Garber
5th Wall – a post production company
Blog: GARBERSHOP -
Joe Mordecai
June 11, 2013 at 6:14 ami still have the ATI Radeon HD 5870 from when I bought my Mac Pro 5,1 in 2010. The last few months, especially after using FCPX for my work, I’ve been thinking of upgrading the card.
But I’ll be honest, I haven’t yet because 1) I wanted to wait to see what Apple had in store for this new generation and 2) call me sorta GPU-illiterate, but I never quite got a good sense of what the best card to upgrade to would be for FCPX. The Sapphire seemed like a good bet (especially at the price), but then I heard it didn’t offer too much of an advantage. Any thoughts on the best card for FCPX right now?
Alas, FCPX still runs fine with the 5870, but I would be looking for more zip. Considering it’s been nearly three years of totally fine usage, I’d imagine the new Mac Pro’s GPUs would be good for at least the same amount of time if not longer.
Who the hell knows. I still want one.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up