Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe Premiere Pro Understanding standard def., 720X480 vs. 640X480

  • Understanding standard def., 720X480 vs. 640X480

    Posted by Wesley Dysart on March 18, 2010 at 10:20 pm

    I’m about to head to Miami and was looking at little portable camcorders. I notice many of them say they shoot 4:3 640X480. The company I work for does NTSC for many of our jobs, and I’ve been led to believe it’s 4:3 @ 720X480. Wikipedia tells me that standard def. is 8:9, which would be 4:4.5, not 4:3, even more strange, if I do the math, dividing by 180 to get the 720 down to 4 I’m left with 480 resulting in 2.666666, so by my calculations 720X480 is approx. 4:2.666666

    I did some more reading and found people saying that with standard def pixels aren’t square, so when 720 plays back it compresses or something down to 640, thus making it 4:3.

    If a normal television is SD, and SD is 720X480 (4:3? or 8:9?), what’s all this 640X480 business about? Would video shot in 640X480 be pillar boxed on a SD television?

    I wound up getting a cheapo pocket HD camera (the Flip Ultra thingamahogger) so this isn’t an urgent question on my part. But since I’m hoping to get more into the audio/video business I figure I should understand fundamentally why there seems to be a discrepancy here. HD specs seem to be more uniform.

    Any info or links are appreciated 😀

    Rory Newman replied 12 years, 4 months ago 4 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • Vincent Rosati

    March 31, 2010 at 8:50 pm

    I realize this is a late response. Anyway, here is link to some info that I found useful in understanding video specs:
    https://lipas.uwasa.fi/~f76998/video/

    To my understanding, Standard definition like DV was created as a bridge between Analog and Digital.
    Analog television was a D1 format, 720×486. DV is 720×480. The 6 missing vertical lines allow DV’s dimensions to be divisible by 16, which is the block size of common compression systems. And it removes top and bottom pixel rows, which are typically the most degraded lines in an analog signal.

    640×480 is a square pixel frame size for Full Screen DV video.
    I think DVD specifications allow for 640×480, it wouldn’t be pillarboxed on a standard full screen display, so long as the DVD is encoded properly, and the playback unit hasn’t had a user controlled setting that would interfere with it.

    A lot of confusion comes from there being a lot of incomplete information out there, and many times number are rounded so you are not actually working with the correct numbers. You have to dig real deep to find the type of numbers you are looking for.

    In DV, both Full Screen and Widescreen are 720×480.
    Full Screen 4:3 has a Pixel Aspect Ratio of 0.9 (approximate!, It’s closer to 0.89), so 720×0.89=640 (rounded to the nearest integer divisible by 16). So, Full Screen 720×480, when displayed properly, appears as 640×480.
    Widescreen 16:9 has a PAR of 1.2. So 720×1.2=864, which is the width that widescreen appears in when it is displayed properly.

    It’s a jungle out there.

    Vince

    *Please remember to Rate our replies or check Solution if solved. If you get a good idea from the post, consider clicking the Kudos option.

  • Sky Spooner

    November 22, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    Hi,

    I stumbled on to your post because I have a related question. I’m encoding a program from DVD using stream clip so that I can deliver to the iTunes video store. The program is an 80s concert video that is 4×3 NTSC. However, Apple spec calls for 4×3 to have 720×480 resolution. But when I encode at 720×480 the program appears stretched. If I encode at 640×480 it looks correct. I know Apple will reject if I deliver 640×480.

    What can I do to deliver as a 720×480 without it looking stretched? I have Final Cut at my disposal if need be.

    Any ideas?

  • Vincent Rosati

    November 22, 2010 at 5:35 pm

    Probably either…
    Edit in a DV 720×480 Full Screen (0.9:1) project, this would fill the screen and display properly so long as the playback method honors the PAR flag.
    Or pillarbox the 640×480 into a 720×480 square pixel (1:1) project.

    If it’s a long program, it’s usually a good idea to do encoding tests before doing the final encode – just encode a 10-30 sec. clip to see if everything looks as you expect.

    Vince

    *Please remember to Rate our replies or check Solution if solved. If you get a good idea from the post, consider clicking the Kudos option.

  • Rory Newman

    January 8, 2014 at 3:35 pm

    Hi chaps.

    Want to encode a film in MPEG4 to give to the subjects for use with a portable DVD player (on a usb stick.)

    Never used MPEG4 or a portable dvd player before. But one I looked at on the web said it accepted MPEG4 at SD. So I’m compressing my 1920×1080 Apple Pro Res 422 into MPEG4 custom 16:9 frame size 640×360 pixel aspect 1.

    Is this right?

    Basically, we’re gonna buy our subjects a portable DVD player so they can see themselves. (Burned a couple of SD disks too, but want to give them an unscratchable stick as well.)

    Obviously would like it in the best quality, but needs to be played by the player.

    Do you think this is the right frame size for MPEG4 SD? (Or would a player accept a 720 or even 1080 frame size if it’s MPEG4?)

    Help much appreciated as my partner’s flying out today and will see them in a couple of days.

    Thanks in advance.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy