Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy uncompressed 8 bit and apple pro res

  • uncompressed 8 bit and apple pro res

    Posted by Fadwa Mawaheb on March 15, 2010 at 2:03 pm

    Dear sir, i have captured my HDCAM tapes using the APPLE PRO RES 422 but when i saw someone else capturing HDCAM tapes with uncompressed 8 bit 4:2:2 i was in a shock from the difference in quality… If i know want to change to uncompressed 8 bit after finishing my edit how is that possible?

    Michael Gissing replied 16 years, 4 months ago 7 Members · 9 Replies
  • 9 Replies
  • Walter Biscardi

    March 15, 2010 at 3:16 pm

    [Fadwa Mawaheb] “If i know want to change to uncompressed 8 bit after finishing my edit how is that possible?”

    You recapture all the footage to 8bit Uncompressed.

    We’ve run tests here and have not seen any discernable difference between ProRes and Uncompressed viewing playback on a 50″ Panasonic Pro HD screen and a projected 12′ image from a Panasonic DLP Pro Projector.

    The quality of the final product is wholly reflected by the quality of the original material.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Editor, Colorist, Director, Writer, Consultant, Author, Chef.
    HD Post and Production
    Biscardi Creative Media

    “Foul Water, Fiery Serpent” featuring Sigourney Weaver coming soon.

    Blog Twitter Facebook

  • Robb Harriss

    March 15, 2010 at 3:54 pm

    yeah, there really shouldn’t be a big difference visually between the two. I used to capture HDCAM in 8 or 10 bit uncompressed but don’t bother anymore. For us it’s a decision between HQ or not.
    If you’re seeing a big difference in your footage I’d look elsewhere in the chain.

    Non-linear: all the time and nothing but.

  • Walter Biscardi

    March 15, 2010 at 4:07 pm

    [Robb Harriss] “For us it’s a decision between HQ or not.”

    HQ is only necessary for 10bit or higher material, generally anything over 1080. We only do ProRes for all our material.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Editor, Colorist, Director, Writer, Consultant, Author, Chef.
    HD Post and Production
    Biscardi Creative Media

    “Foul Water, Fiery Serpent” featuring Sigourney Weaver coming soon.

    Blog Twitter Facebook

  • Gary Adcock

    March 15, 2010 at 6:25 pm

    [Fadwa Mawaheb] “i have captured my HDCAM tapes using the APPLE PRO RES 422 but when i saw someone else capturing HDCAM tapes with uncompressed 8 bit 4:2:2 i was in a shock from the difference in quality.”

    HDCam tape is 8bit with 3:1:1 compression on tape.
    ProRes in all flavors is 10 bit 4:2:2 when used as a capture codec.

    You do not say what computer or how the files were captured, if you captured on low powered computer or as anything other than HD there could be a huge difference in the file quality.

    There is also a huge difference between HDCam tapes and HDCamSR tape in quality of the imagery.

    It all gets down to how it was recorded.

    gary adcock
    Studio37
    HD & Film Consultation
    Post and Production Workflows for the Digitally Inclined
    Chicago, IL

    https://blogs.creativecow.net/24640

  • Robb Harriss

    March 15, 2010 at 7:15 pm

    All our stuff has been HDCAM for years. We have a Kona on the MacPro. ProRes 422 looks great even compared to 8 bit and 10 bit.

    Non-linear: all the time and nothing but.

  • Fadwa Mawaheb

    March 15, 2010 at 7:48 pm

    Well since u all agreed that the pro res is same like the 8 bit I will work with but I gotta tell u
    That when I exported the material uncompressed 8 bit there
    Was a huge difference in the quality… Thanks for a helping a lost woman in the field 😉

  • John Pale

    March 15, 2010 at 9:51 pm

    [Fadwa Mawaheb] “Well since u all agreed that the pro res is same like the 8 bit I will work with but I gotta tell u
    That when I exported the material uncompressed 8 bit there
    Was a huge difference in the qualit”

    If you are seeing a huge difference, there is a problem at your end. ProRes has been tested up and down by many experienced professionals (search for Gary’s work on it). You need to investigate what might be causing your issues before you continue using it, or else you might very well end up with an inferior looking product..

  • Rafael Amador

    March 16, 2010 at 2:04 am

    [Fadwa Mawaheb] “That when I exported the material uncompressed 8 bit there
    Was a huge difference in the quality..”

    But you don’t say which one looks better.
    The perfect codec to capture HDCAM is 8b Unc.
    If you are able to work with 8b Unc, do it. Then finish in 10b (Unc or Prores).
    rafael

    http://www.nagavideo.com

  • Michael Gissing

    March 16, 2010 at 2:23 am

    I presume both the ProRes and Uncompressed are in the same pixel aspect. If you are seeing a difference, perhaps you are not maintaining 1920 x 1080 with both codecs.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy